Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Will Gold Prices Finally Pull Back or Continue Marching Ahead?

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/will-gold-prices-finally-pull-back-continue-marching-ahead/

Gold prices are up more than 11% since bottoming last December. Their gains last week took the gold market right up to its 50-week moving average. In 2015, attempted rallies reversed at the 50-week moving average. Could this level once again serve as a barrier to further price advances?

Either way, long-term gold bulls shouldn’t sweat this particular technical level. Major bull markets need to pull back and reconsolidate periodically.

Whether that starts happening this week, or later on at higher price levels, a downturn of some magnitude is inevitable.

One indicator that may be pointing toward a pullback sooner rather than later is the negative divergence in gold mining stocks which are often leading indicators for the yellow metal.

Despite gold spot prices rallying along with the broader U.S. equity market last week, the HUI Gold BUGS (Basket of Unhedged Gold Stocks) Index fell by 3.8%. That suggests that some big institutional speculators are turning bearish on gold near term.

If you’re looking to accumulate bullion, a pullback should be welcomed as an opportunity to get in at lower levels. Long-term bulls will not want to see anything as severe as the drawdown that occurred in the second half of 2016, however. They will be looking for any coming correction to bottom out above the $1,125/oz low hit in December.

Higher highs and higher lows characterize a major bull market. The December 2016 low was a higher low than the one from 2015. A higher high will occur when gold prices can move above $1,375. At that point, the public might start taking notice of precious metals markets – which so far this year have been overshadowed by the series of record highs in the U.S. stock market.

President Donald Trump has taken credit for the rally in stocks. His vows to cut taxes and regulations have, no doubt, driven buying by investors.

Over the weekend, Trump sent out this tweet: “Great optimism for future of U.S. business, AND JOBS, with the DOW having an 11th straight record close. Big tax & regulation cuts coming!”

Trump also wants a weaker dollar to help boost U.S. manufacturing. That could put him in conflict with the Janet Yellen Fed if it moves to raise interest rates.

Trump will have the opportunity to appoint multiple new members to the Federal Reserve Board. It’s one of the reasons why top financial and geopolitical analyst Jim Rickards is so bullish on gold.

“If Trump follows through on the logic of the cheaper dollar, he’s going to appoint doves to the Board. The market’s going to get the signal immediately and the price of gold is going to soar,” Rickards said in a recent Money Metals podcast interview. “We’ve got some very short run headwinds, maybe between now and April, but for certainly the second half, even the last three quarters of the year, I’m extremely bullish on gold.”

There will be some bumps along the way. But those who hang on tight for the ride in gold and silver markets stand to be rewarded.

Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC, and his writings have appeared in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, Washington Times, and National Review.

The post Will Gold Prices Finally Pull Back or Continue Marching Ahead? appeared first on Gold Silver Worlds.

Importance of Hiding Gold Creatively and Securely If Taking Delivery

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-28/importance-hiding-gold-creatively-and-securely-if-taking-delivery

Importance of Hiding Gold Creatively and Securely If Taking Delivery

  • Why gold retains value?
  • Interesting unknown gold facts
  • "Prepare your jaws for a sizeable drop!"
  • History, finite, rare and peak gold
  • "It is beautiful to look at..."
  • 'Heavy metal' - Thud sound of a gold bar (kilo)
  • 'Going for gold' - Olympic gold medals to Chelthenham 'Gold Cup'
  • Peak gold ... "Hard work to get gold out of the ground..."
  • How much an Oscar is actually worth?
  • Importance of hiding gold creatively and securely if taking delivery
  • Owning a safe - "hidden away and bolted down"
  • Owning gold in secure storage in Zurich, Singapore and Hong Kong

gold-interview-2017

It's the day after the Oscars and we've got gold on our minds!

Mark O'Byrne from Goldcore Ireland popped in to chat to Dermot & Dave this morning.

Mark told us lots of interesting facts that we didn't know and revealed how much an Oscar is actually worth...

The entire statue is actually only sprayed with gold and is therefore worth a measly €600.

Interview can be listened to on Today FM here

Gold and Silver Bullion - News and Commentary

Gold falls from 3-1/2 mth high, Trump speech on the radar (Reuters)

Gold prices eke out 3rd gain in a row (Marketwatch)

Fed may need to raise interest rates in ‘near future’: Kaplan (Reuters)

Trump seeks 'historic' U.S. military spending boost, domestic cuts (Reuters)

Gold fingered for distorting Brexit Britain’s trade balance (FT)

Trump and Elections Angst Combine to Boost Europe Gold ETFs (Bloomberg)

Buffett: No, we never said stocks are ‘forever’ (Marketwatch)

"Everything Will Grind to a Halt in 2017" - Stockman (YouTube)

Losses of £58 Bln since the 2008 bailout – how did RBS get here? (The Guardian)

American Eagle silver bullion coins struck at three facilities in FY 2016 (Coinworld.com)

Gold Prices (LBMA AM)

28 Feb: USD 1,251.90, GBP 1,006.90 & EUR 1,180.79 per ounce
27 Feb: USD 1,256.25, GBP 1,011.16 & EUR 1,187.41 per ounce
24 Feb: USD 1,255.35, GBP 1,000.89 & EUR 1,185.18 per ounce
23 Feb: USD 1,237.35, GBP 992.97 & EUR 1,173.13 per ounce
22 Feb: USD 1,237.50, GBP 994.21 & EUR 1,178.22 per ounce
21 Feb: USD 1,228.70, GBP 988.86 & EUR 1,166.16 per ounce
20 Feb: USD 1,235.35, GBP 991.49 & EUR 1,163.21 per ounce

Silver Prices (LBMA)

28 Feb: USD 18.28, GBP 14.70 & EUR 17.24 per ounce
27 Feb: USD 18.34, GBP 14.77 & EUR 17.33 per ounce
24 Feb: USD 18.27, GBP 14.56 & EUR 17.23 per ounce
23 Feb: USD 18.00, GBP 14.42 & EUR 17.06 per ounce
22 Feb: USD 18.00, GBP 14.47 & EUR 17.14 per ounce
21 Feb: USD 17.89, GBP 14.41 & EUR 16.97 per ounce
20 Feb: USD 17.98, GBP 14.42 & EUR 16.92 per ounce


Recent Market Updates

- Oscars Debacle – Movies More Costly As Dollar Devalued
- Gold Up 9% YTD – 4th Higher Weekly Close and Breaks Resistance At $1,250/oz
- The Oscars – Worth Their Weight in Gold?
- Gold To Benefit from Rising Inflation and Higher Than “Official” China Gold Demand
- Russia Gold Buying Is Back – Buys One Million Ounces In January
- Gold The “Ultimate Insurance Policy” as “Grave Concerns About Euro” – Greenspan
- Sharia Standard May See Gold Surge
- Gold Price To 2 Month High As Fiery Trump Declares World Order
- Gold’s Gains 15% In Inauguration Years Since 1974
- Turkey, ‘Axis of Gold’ and the End of US Dollar Hegemony
- Gold Up 5.5% YTD – Hard Brexit Cometh and Weaker Dollar Under Trump
- Bitcoin and Gold – Outlook and Safe Haven?
- Physical Gold Will ‘Trump’ Paper Gold

Interested in learning more about physical gold and silver?
Call GoldCore and speak with a Gold and Silver Specialist today!

Monday, February 27, 2017

Equity Funds Buy Gold - Careful What You Wish For!

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-27/equity-funds-buy-gold-careful-what-you-wish

Equity Funds Buy Gold Now, 1987 Redux?
SUMMARY
written by Vince Lanci for Marketslant.com
Be careful what you wish for. More equity funds are buying Gold as a hedge against stock exposure. That is a 2-edged sword.

OVERVIEW
Gold is reflecting many basic worries that have no seeming resolution on the horizon
Eurozone elections,
Problems in Venezuela,Greece,Italy,
Currency changes in India

GOLD AWARENESS INCREASES
We've noticed more stock market 'hedgers' buying the rally. This growing number of buyers hedging their stock market exposure would appear to be solid evidence of a changing view towards Gold. And for sure it does reflect anxiety and raised awareness to Gold and Silver's qualities in the broader markets.
We want to add an important historical caveat that should not be ignored. Ever.

THE CRASH OF 1987 WAS A DISASTER FOR GOLD
In 1987 on the morning of the Stock market crash, Gold was called to open "limit up". When the Comex actually opened, futures were trading Limit Down. This was almost entirely a function of margin calls being issued for funds who had bought stock on margin and had to raise cash immediately.
The first thing these funds did was liquidate all other holdings in subservience to their stock positions. That meant Gold, their hedge, got dumped.

SIZE MATTERS WHEN THE EXIT LIGHT GOES ON
Fund managers did not understand the size of the Gold market then and the resulting stampede killed Gold. In the end they had to puke their stock positions to, but not until they and their advisors told them to liquidate their winners first. Gold went from being a winning effective hedge to a loss.
Many funds still do not understand the importance of exit liquidity. We strongly advise you as a Gold Investor to brace yourselves if Stocks drop precipitously again. It would be a buying opportunity for sure. But only if you are not leveraged.

BE BULLISH STOCKS
History may not repeat itself. Many Funds understand the risks now. But newer funds run by managers who only know the world of Bernanke and Yellen may not.
Just know that more people are using Gold as a stock market hedge right now. That is not a bad thing in and of itself. It is a horrible thing if those buyers are long stocks on leverage. And if recent history of funds using Gold as a hedge for 'event risk', like the Brexit Gold Exit are any indication, the risk to Gold is real.
If stocks were to plummet, we'd like to see gold hold. Seeing this, we could reasonably assess the market as balanced between sellers liquidating to handle stock margin calls and buyers expecting a QE 4 or in the least another 'non-rate hike' quarter.
What a Gold investor should want is for stocks to not selloff, but trade sideways now. This will be a sign of market balancing future economic expectations, which includes high values due to inflation's effect on earnings. This in turn makes Gold the undervalued asset for those stock longs looking for something else to buy.

We are on the road and writing with less than ideal graphic capabilities. A thank you to George Gero for some of he data below.

THIS MORNING:
Gold pausing recent rally, ahead of President Trump speaking tomorrow night
Traders considering March Open Meeting of the FED as well
Friday's WSJ had a gold story. Assume more buying with headline watchers at least initially

TAPE WATCHING:
Open interest near year high 456,473 in futures
Funds added as 1250 area was reached.
Momentum funds now buying alongside genuine 'worry money'
Copper 276018 also good amount OI.
Silver open interest is 210,996.
Gold-silver ratio 68.35,
Gold-plat 228.80
Dollar index 101 and change
April-June spread gold 330, as rollover not a factor yet.

Silver story next as the market has indeed started its climb to the $21 area where that big chunk of calls was sold last week as reported here previously.
Good luck
Vbl

Oscars Debacle - Movies More Costly As Dollar Devalued

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-27/oscars-debacle-movies-more-costly-dollar-devalued

Oscars Debacle - Movies More Costly As Dollar Devalued

  • Cost of Best Picture winners show very significant devaluation of the dollar
  • Average cost to make an Oscar winning film is over $43 million - in gold terms, this is over 106,000 ounces
  • Four $15 million films show nearly 100% difference when priced in gold ounces
  • Oscar fiasco was courtesy of error by accountants PWC
  • Whilst the price of the films remained the same, the cost in gold ounces fell from 11.53% of the cost to make the Departed, in 2009 to just 6.4% in 2012
  • In an error prone, irrational and volatile world, gold retains value over time ...

snip20170227_4

The Oscars - the drama of the dollar

Oscars night seemingly sent Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway a bit La La as they declared the wrong film the winner of the Best Picture Award at the Oscars, last night.

Instead of announcing 'Moonlight' as the winner of the industry’s highest accolade, they read out 'La La Land'. Cue a few awkward moments, no doubt some heads rolling behind the scenes of the Dolby Theatre and a Daily Mail headline of ‘FAKE OSCARS FIASCO.’

Which it wasn’t really, just a bit odd after a very slick night.

Moonlight was the story of a man who grows up unsure and occasionally uncomfortable about who he is. La La Land is a musical love story about a couple trying to make it in LA - a city known for destroying hopes and throwing many hopefuls to the wayside. Both narratives are not unfamiliar to the world in which we find ourselves. Unfortunately our world is not a fantasy and will certainly not be done with our attentions in just over two hours.

When we wrote about the Oscars last week, we asked if they were Worth Their Weight in Gold and concluded that whilst we might dream in gold just like the glitterati, perhaps gold bullion would be a better investment for most of us. We showed that the price of gold has climbed 60 times ever since the first ceremony in 1929, a sobering example of the devaluation of fiat currencies in the last 88 years.

Whilst we think the devaluation of the dollar, and the maintained value of gold is the lesson to take away, there are a number of different lessons actors, directors and studios would like the critics and viewers to believe they can draw from their masterpieces. For some this is about the big bucks and box office numbers, and how they can make or break a film.

We agree, today there a few examples around that really show how little value the dollar carries.

Now that we are on the other side of the most 89th Academy Awards we take a look at what we can learn from last night’s behemoth that was the Oscars and the films that they work to honour.

Cost of making Best Picture

 In the last twenty years, the average cost to make an Oscar winning film is over $43 million. In gold terms it is over 106,000 ounces.

The above graph doesn’t mean very much though, just that the cost of films go up and down, no matter what currency you decide to price it in.

In the decade of the financial crisis, this has come down somewhat and the average is more like $27 million, or 29,600 ounces. This statistic alone shows you how the dollar is falling in real value. Whilst the average cost in US Dollars to make a winning film is 60% in the last decade, compared to the average in the last 20 years, it is just 27% of the 20 year average when priced in gold ounces.

When you rebase to 100, using 2007 as the base year, then you begin to see some interesting results. Conveniently, Martin Scorcese’s 2007 The Departed is the most expensive Best Picture film in the last decade, cost ing $90 million. This was equal to just over 150,000 ounces of gold. No film since then has cost as much. Lincoln was close, costing just 72% of the price of Scorcese’s epic gangster film, but interestingly when priced in gold it cost just 26% percent of the Departed’s gold budget, with 39,000 ounces needed to fund the biopic.

snip20170227_3

The $15 million question

Perhaps as a sign of the times, Best Picture winners have been getting cheaper in recent years. Moonlight cost just $5 million to make, the lowest price for a winning film in at least two decades. It was also the cheapest in terms of gold ounces, costing just 3,997 ounces.

It is when we look at years when films are significantly cheaper that we see real evidence of gold’s purchasing power in the land of stars. Between 2009 and 2012 each Best Picture winner cost $15 million. This is 17% of the cost to make The Departed. One unfamiliar with gold’s ability to hold value would probably think that it costs a similar amount in gold ounces, but unsurprisingly this is not the case.

Whilst the price of the films remained the same, the cost in gold ounces fell from 11.53% of the cost to make the Departed, in 2009 to to just 6.4% in 2012.

snip20170227_2

One can easily conclude that had film financiers bought gold at the start of the financial crisis then there films would have cost far less to make.

Does more money mean more gold?

One would assume that when we hear phrases such as ‘the highest grossing film of all time’, then it’s something Donald Trump would say and you would wonder if it was true or not…or in this day and age maybe you would believe that it is actually the highest grossing film of all time. But when you look at the box office takings in terms of real money, gold, then it tells a different story and this is a case of FAKE NEWS!

Really? Hollywood lied? Yes, we can prove it.

The King’s Speech made the most fiat money at the Box Office in the last ten years, nearly 29% more than the Departed (which comes in second). But it only made 63% of the Departed’s takings, when priced in gold. This means it made less in gold ounces, than the Departed, and yet fiat currencies would have us believe that it was nearly 30% more successful.

This year’s winner, Moonlight, was not only the cheapest film to win in the last decade, but also the lowest in terms of takings. This is true for both dollars and gold ounces. However the percentage difference is drastically different - by over 100%.

Moonlight made 7.4% of the amount the Departed made in 2007 when priced in USD. But when it comes to gold it made just 3.6% of the Departed’s takings.
snip20170227_1

 


Conclusion - Never trust the favourite…or an accountant ... or fiat currencies ...

For all of Reagan’s and now, Donald Trump’s talk about ‘draining the swamp’ it seems that maybe Hollywood needs to perhaps consider doing the same. The fault of the Oscar mishap was courtesy of big accountancy firm Price Waterhouse Coopers.

Just a few days ago Martha Ruiz and Brian Cullina, the two PWC bods responsible for handing the correct envelopes to the presenters were interviewed about their roles as the only individuals who know the results before the winners do.

Cullina told the Art and Science blog, “The producers decide what the order of the awards will be. We each have a full set. I have all 24 envelopes in my briefcase; Martha has all 24 in hers. We stand on opposite sides of the stage, right off-screen, for the entire evening, and we each hand the respective envelope to the presenter. It doesn’t sound very complicated, but you have to make sure you’re giving the presenter the right envelope.”

Turns out that it wasn’t as simple as they were hoping to be, hence three producers thanking wives and families for supporting them in making a film that it turned out didn’t win the most coveted Oscar.

The speeches of the losing side were all about how this shows that dreams really can come true. How ironic. It seems a good analogy for what we see today, false investment hopes and false monetary rewards that can ultimately be ripped away on a moments’ notice thanks to some silly administration error by a firm or bank who isn’t held accountable.

The difference with physical gold bullion bars and coins is that it can’t just be made to disappear. You don’t have to worry about a counter party making a mistake and vanishing your hard earned rewards and wealth into thin air.

But, this can be tough to believe when gold is consistently downplayed by the mainstream.

For the last three years the bookies’ favourite has failed to spark the interest of Academy voters when it comes to the Best Picture Award. Boyhood in 2015, The Revenant in 2016, and now La La Land have each been touted as winners but have been left disappointed on the night.

This is very much reflective of the mainstream’s approach to gold. It is consistently dismissed as something that is a bit too kooky to do well and one shouldn’t focus on it in the long-term, instead we should look at stock markets and big tech companies and definitely save in fiat currencies like the dollar, the pound and the euro.

But, as our analysis shows, gold has been the consistent winner alongside all of those Big Picture winners, underdogs or not.

Billion of dollars are ploughed into these films, whether they are huge A-list casts or made up of Indie newbies. While the dollar cost of movies has been falling in recent years - in real terms - in gold terms the cost is rising.

Movie producers, companies and investors should consider owning physical gold in order to hedge the declining value of the dollar and other fiat currencies.

Whilst the price of gold, like any tradeable asset or currency does fluctuate, analyses such as ours above shows that gold retains value over the long term.

Sign Up Here For Gold News, Research & Special Offers

 

Gold and Silver Bullion - News and Commentary

Gold holds near 3-1/2 mth highs; Trump economic policy in focus (Reuters)

Gold prices extend 2017 gains, rally looking robust (Bulliondesk)

Gold and Silver had a very good week (FX Street)

How a Tiny Gold Fund and TV Treasure Hunter Got Out-Sized Return (Bloomberg)

Greek central bank holds 5.26 bln euros of gold, half stored abroad (Times of India)

How France scrapping the euro could go beyond a ‘Lehman moment’ (CNBC)

President Trump: Replace The Dollar With Gold As The Global Currency To Make America Great Again (Forbes)

Bullish as Gold rallies in face of expected Fed rate hikes (Scrap Register)

Back From Never Gone: CURRENCY WARS (Zero Hedge)

Safe havens of gold, yen and Treasuries perform well with equities holding on (FX Street )

Gold Prices (LBMA AM)

27 Feb: USD 1,256.25, GBP 1,011.16 & EUR 1,187.41 per ounce
24 Feb: USD 1,255.35, GBP 1,000.89 & EUR 1,185.18 per ounce
23 Feb: USD 1,237.35, GBP 992.97 & EUR 1,173.13 per ounce
22 Feb: USD 1,237.50, GBP 994.21 & EUR 1,178.22 per ounce
21 Feb: USD 1,228.70, GBP 988.86 & EUR 1,166.16 per ounce
20 Feb: USD 1,235.35, GBP 991.49 & EUR 1,163.21 per ounce
17 Feb: USD 1,241.40, GBP 1,000.57 & EUR 1,165.55 per ounce

Silver Prices (LBMA)

27 Feb: USD 18.34, GBP 14.77 & EUR 17.33 per ounce
24 Feb: USD 18.27, GBP 14.56 & EUR 17.23 per ounce
23 Feb: USD 18.00, GBP 14.42 & EUR 17.06 per ounce
22 Feb: USD 18.00, GBP 14.47 & EUR 17.14 per ounce
21 Feb: USD 17.89, GBP 14.41 & EUR 16.97 per ounce
20 Feb: USD 17.98, GBP 14.42 & EUR 16.92 per ounce
17 Feb: USD 18.01, GBP 14.50 & EUR 16.91 per ounce


Recent Market Updates

- Gold Up 9% YTD – 4th Higher Weekly Close and Breaks Resistance At $1,250/oz
- The Oscars – Worth Their Weight in Gold?
- Gold To Benefit from Rising Inflation and Higher Than “Official” China Gold Demand
- Russia Gold Buying Is Back – Buys One Million Ounces In January
- Gold The “Ultimate Insurance Policy” as “Grave Concerns About Euro” – Greenspan
- Sharia Standard May See Gold Surge
- Gold Price To 2 Month High As Fiery Trump Declares World Order
- Gold’s Gains 15% In Inauguration Years Since 1974
- Turkey, ‘Axis of Gold’ and the End of US Dollar Hegemony
- Gold Up 5.5% YTD – Hard Brexit Cometh and Weaker Dollar Under Trump
- Bitcoin and Gold – Outlook and Safe Haven?
- Physical Gold Will ‘Trump’ Paper Gold
- Gold Lower Before Trump Presidency – Strong Gains Akin To After Obama Inauguration

Interested in learning more about physical gold and silver?
Call GoldCore and speak with a Gold and Silver Specialist today!

Curious Gold-Silver Ratio That Did Not Fall, Report 26 Feb, 2017

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-27/curious-gold-silver-ratio-did-not-fall-report-26-feb-2017

This holiday-shortened week (Monday was President’s Day in the US), the price of the dollar fell. In gold, it fell almost half a milligram to 24.75mg, and prices in silver it dropped 30mg, to 1.7 grams of the white monetary metal. Flipped upside down, gold went up 23 notes from the Federal Reserve, and silver appears to go up by 41 cents.

Below, we will show the only true picture of the gold and silver supply and demand fundamentals. But first, the price and ratio charts.

The Prices of Gold and Silver
The Prices of Gold and Silver

Next, this is a graph of the gold price measured in silver, otherwise known as the gold to silver ratio. It moved sideways again this week, which would normally be odd for a time when the prices of the metals are rising.

The Ratio of the Gold Price to the Silver Price
The Ratio of the Gold Price to the Silver Price

For each metal, we will look at a graph of the basis and cobasis overlaid with the price of the dollar in terms of the respective metal. It will make it easier to provide brief commentary. The dollar will be represented in green, the basis in blue and cobasis in red.

Here is the gold graph.

The Gold Basis and Cobasis and the Dollar Price
The Gold Basis and Cobasis and the Dollar Price

For a very long time, we would post graphs that looked almost the same. Oh, the specifics of month, price, and basis would be different. But they had a certain sameness. The price of the dollar (i.e. inverse of the price of gold, in dollar terms) would move along with the cobasis (i.e. scarcity of gold). So as the dollar would rise (i.e. the price of gold would fall), the scarcity would rise. And vice versa. This means changes in price were due to changes in behavior by speculators.

And now we have a clear picture of … the opposite. The dollar has been falling since mid-December. And for that same time, the cobasis (scarcity of gold) has been rising.

Yes, gold has been getting scarcer as it becomes pricier.

How could this be possible? Doesn’t the law of supply and demand work for gold? You know, the standard “X” graph from Econ. 101?

Gold has several unique properties. One is that it is not purchased for consumption, but for monetary reserves or jewelry (which in most of the world is monetary reserves). Contrast that to copper which is purchased by plumbing manufacturers to make pipe. It’s a competitive market, and if the price of copper plumbing goes up too much then home builders will switch to plastic. Demand drops as price rises. Also, the marginal copper mine will increase production. Supply rises as price rises. It is self-correcting.

Gold, not being bought to consume, does not have a limit to demand as price rises. If anything a rising price (i.e. a falling currency) signals to people that holding gold is a good thing. They were wise to get out of their falling paper currency, and should consider buying more gold.

Also, virtually all of the gold ever mined in human history is still in human hands. All of this gold is potential supply, at the right price and under the right conditions. Even if gold mining worked like copper mining, and miners could just produce more, changes in mine production at the margin are not material to the overall gold supply. By official estimates, the total inventory of gold would take over 70 years to be produced at current mine production rates (and we believe this is a low estimate).

Readers may object that this question is a bit unfair, as any commodity can experience rising tightness and that will accompany its rising price for a while until the market can correct itself. That is true, but what we are looking at in gold is not that at all. When the market corrects itself—which we think is very likely, we do not see Armageddon just yet—it will not be because gold miners have cranked up their outputs, nor because gold users have substituted another metal. There is no substitute for monetary reservation, particularly as paper currencies are in the terminal stages of failure.

Our calculated fundamental price is now up to almost $1,400.

Now let’s look at silver.

The Silver Basis and Cobasis and the Dollar Price
The Silver Basis and Cobasis and the Dollar Price

The trend of falling dollar (i.e. rising price of silver) and rising cobasis (scarcity) is here in silver, too, but it’s weaker.

Silver does not quite have the same stocks to flows ratio as gold, but it has far and away a higher ratio than copper or any ordinary commodity. That is why silver is the other monetary metal.

The fundamental price of silver is now up to about $18.70. While this is over the market price of the metal, it’s not nearly so much above as gold.

This is why we calculate a fundamental on the gold-silver ratio over 74.

© 2017 Monetary Metals

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Back From Never Gone: CURRENCY WARS

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-26/back-never-gone-currency-wars

US Dollar Chinese Yuan

In the previous episode of the currency wars, a few years ago, the Euro-Dollar exchange rate was in the spotlight. This has now completely disappeared to the background and whilst the countries of the Eurozone must be pretty happy with the weak currency (which boosts the export and increases the demand for domestically produced goods), the United States are less than happy as it weakens the position of the country on the export market.

China 4

Source: Tradingeconomics

You might have missed it when the mass media were falling over themselves to crucify president Trump, but we had the impression currency wars, and protecting the position of the United States on the world market were pretty high on his ‘to do list’ after decades of huge trade deficits. As you can see on the next image, there clearly is a huge discrepancy in the trade numbers between China and the United States. A substantial trade deficit, which has been nipped in the bud by China using their hard dollars to purchase US Treasuries.

China 2

Source: Danske Bank

Whereas the president was definitely pointing fingers at China during his election campaign, he seems to have been softer after a recent call with the Chinese president.

Does this mean the USA and China are now best buddies again? Probably not. It’s far more likely the president has realized he won’t be able to get much done when he gets in a direct confrontation with China. His staff has now launched a ‘test balloon’ and widened the scope of the currency manipulation investigation. Instead of singling out China, the White House will now be using a more general approach, and has even singled out Germany.

China 1

Source: Danske Bank

In order to be able to ‘sell’ this idea to concerned countries and entities, the Trump administration might present its own ‘alternative facts’, according to the Wall Street Journal. Even though the trade deficit between the United States and China is very clear in the previous image, it’s entirely possible the White House will introduce a new standard to calculate the trade deficit, to increase the deficit numbers.

According to a paper published by the Trump camp during the election campaign, China was really the main focus of the Economic plan. According to the paper; ‘In a world of freely floating currencies, the US dollar would weaken and the Chinese yuan would strengthen because the US runs a large trade deficit with China and the rest of the world. American exports to China would then rise, Chinese imports to America would fall, and trade should come back towards balance’.

China 3

Source: The Trump Economic Plan

That’s an absolutely accurate description, and even in the white paper, the Trump camp looked to things on a larger scale instead of focusing on China. Even the European Monetary Union and specifically Germany were singled out as examples of ‘currency manipulators’.

So don’t be surprised if the White House suddenly announces a plan to use a new method to calculate the trade deficits, in order to make the deficits appear to be larger than they really are. And this could absolutely re-shape the world and increase the impact from currency exchange rates. This doesn’t mean things will definitely change for the worse, but it’s always a very thin line when you’re dealing with powerful trading partners.

It will be difficult to create a win-win situation, but let’s hope it doesn’t turn into a lose-lose situation, as that could cripple the worldwide economy again.

>>> The only REAL currency is GOLD. Read our guide to gold right now! 

Secular Investor offers a fresh look at investing. We analyze long lasting cycles, coupled with a collection of strategic investments and concrete tips for different types of assets. The methods and strategies are transformed into the Gold & Silver Report and the Commodity Report.

Follow us on Facebook @SecularInvestor [NEW] and Twitter @SecularInvest

The Oscars – Gold Plated and Debased Like Dollar

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-23/oscars-%E2%80%93-gold-plated-and-debased-dollar

The Oscars - Worth Their Weight in Gold?

  • 89th Oscars to air this weekend
  • Oscars have been dipped in 24 karat gold since 1929
  • If the Oscars were made of solid gold they would weigh 330 ounces
  • 330 ounces of gold is worth $408,210 at today's prices (nearly €400k & £330k)
  • Oscars cannot be sold, making them a tricky investment piece
  • Steven Spielberg keeps his gold Oscar with the Academy for ‘safe-keeping’
  • Shows importance of owning gold in safest ways
  • Price of gold has climbed from $20.67 since the first Oscars ceremony to over $1,237 today

snip20170223_3

‘We All Dream In Gold’ read the strap line for last year’s Academy Awards. This is no doubt still the case for the nominees of the 24 awards set to be given out at this Sunday’s 89th Oscars.

Since the first awards in 1929 nearly 3,000 oscar statues have been awarded to the lucky darlings of the film industry. After the teary speeches, after-parties and press junkets following their win, what is left for those who have achieved the highest-level of recognition in the film industry?

the-oscars-gold

Winning an Oscar is an expensive business, studios spend millions trying to get their hands on at least one, each year. But film and celebrity is a fickle trade and few people can remember who received Oscars last year, let alone when they were first launched in 1929.

How much value do they really bring?

As we all dream in gold, we’ve spent some time thinking about the golden Oscars, asking just how golden they are and how they hold up when compared to gold itself.

What is an Oscar?

Designed by George Stanley, the Oscar (rumours abound why it is has that nickname) shows a knight standing with a reel of film, clutching his sword. There are five spokes on the base, one representing the branches of the Academy: Actors, directors, producers, writers and technicians.

Fun fact, whilst the Oscars have been going on since 1929 and seemingly little has changed in regard to the appearance of the statue, the mould currently used was only created last year.

The Academy wanted a version of the statue that was closer to the original 1929 design. A 3D printer created the version that is used today and provides the trophies with their more authentic look.

The awards weigh around 8 and a half pounds, and are made from Britannia metal or Britannium and plated in copper, nickel silver, and on the top layer is 24-karat gold. Excluding three years during the Second World War, the statue has always been dipped in gold. So when the Academy says that we all dream in gold, they’re not wrong when it comes to the Oscars.

Worth its weight in gold?

As mentioned above, the gold on the Oscar is the icing on the cake, a cake which is made up of a few layers and alloys. However there is very little gold when it comes to the actual Oscar, in fact just 0.38 microns (one-two hundredth of the thickness of a human hair).

This year’s statues are rumoured to have a monetary worth of $629 each, demonstrating just how little gold Oscar is wearing.

snip20170223_2
This isn’t to say the Academy Award trophies aren’t worth anything.

Since the first ceremony in 1929, the price of gold has climbed from $20.67 to $1,237 today. Just the gold alone, in those 13.5 inch statues have climbed by nearly 60 times in price.

It is a classic example of how the dollar has devalued over the years - the dollar has devalued and has lost 98% of its value against gold in those 88 years.

But what if Hollywood had really wanted to show its stars how much they valued them? What if the dreams of gold really came true and the Oscar was made of solid gold?

At 8.7 lb, the statue in its current form is equivalent to 126.9 troy ounces but this weight has been taken on from the fact that the statue is made up of Britannia metal. Britannia metal is an alloy consisting of approximately 92% tin, 6% antimony and 2% copper.

Assuming that we are working with 24 karat gold with a density of 19.282 g/cm3, then research tells us that the cubic centimetres of this much tin is around 531.25, and it would take nearly 22.6 pounds of gold to fill it. This means a solid gold Oscar would weigh around 330 troy ounces and at today’s price would be worth around $408,210. A significant uptick from last year’s which were worth around $382,000.

Had actors and actresses received solid gold Oscars nearly 30 years ago, in 1991, then they would have seen a climb in value of over 3 times over. Not bad for a few months’ work on a film and not a bad return on any investment.

Regardless of whether or not someone remembers who won and what for, the solid gold Oscar wouldn’t care. The gold would act as a timeless store of value and insurance, no matter what the public and critics think of you and your film in the years ahead.

You can sell your gold but not your Oscar

Some of you might be arguing that the Oscars bring so much more than just a piece of gold, and the kudos that comes with them is priceless. If you were to sell an Oscar, you might argue, then you would get far more thanks to the kudos that comes with it being ‘an Oscar.’

Some trophies from the pre-1950s era have been sold and have done very well. David Copperfield bought Michael Curtiz’s 1942 Oscar for Casablanca, in 2003 for $299,000 later selling it for over $2 million. The 1939 Oscar for Gone With the Wind was estimated to sell for $300,000 in 1999 but was bought at a far higher price of $1.54 million.

You could take a leaf out of Steven Spielberg’s book. The ET director and one of the most successful directors of all time has previously bought two 1950s Oscars and rather than kept them in his cloakroom (as many seem to do) he has handed them both over to the Academy ‘for safekeeping’.

This is a similar approach taken by many who invest in the most precious of metal - gold. Gold investors often use storage facilities provided by the likes of GoldCore in Zurich, Singapore, Hong Kong and elsewhere, in order to maintain the safekeeping of their assets.

But before you start thinking you could go out and invest in an Oscar, it is no longer possible. Unlike investing in gold bars, which are borderless and cannot be controlled by one authority, the Oscars market is restricted. Those who receive Oscars are prevented from selling their awards at market price as since 1950 the trophies have been considered the perpetual property of the Academy.

The ‘Regulations’ section of the oscars.org website reads, ‘Award winners shall not sell or otherwise dispose of the Oscar statuette, nor permit it to be sold or disposed of by operation of law, without first offering to sell it to the Academy for the sum of $1.00. This provision shall apply also to the heirs and assigns of Academy Award winners who may acquire a statuette by gift or bequest.’

The idea is that the honour of winning an Oscar is maintained, were it to be sold then some believe it would be cheapened. This is where a solid gold Oscar would be very different.

The market for gold is affected by economics and the desire to hold gold as a form of insurance, rather than the prestige that comes with owning a piece of something that is gold-plated and was once owned or won by somebody who happened to be famous and or was a great actor.

 Gold does not discriminate, the Oscars do

Few will have missed the furore that surrounds the Academy Awards when it comes to recognition that it shows to ethnic minority groups. The issue has its own hashtag #OscarsSoWhite.

But what few people discuss is the discrimination when it comes to the benefit of winning an Oscar. A 2008 paper by Kevin Sweeney, finds that “an Oscar increases a male winner’s salary by 81% holding all other variables constant.”

But this is not the case for women, Sweeney finds that, “Female winners do not experience this same clear boost in their salaries…women, experience significantly lower salary increases from winning an Academy Award than men. In such cases, winning an Academy Award did not have a statistically significant effect on women’s salaries in the sample.”

As mentioned above, gold does not discriminate when it comes to who you are or when you won, and it certainly doesn’t care what nationality you are.

Gold is a stateless form of money, something that has been bought for generations as a store of value across the globe. The Chinese Aunties don’t care who won an Oscar when it comes to Chinese New Year, parents don’t mind which film won when it comes to buying their daughter’s wedding jewellery in India and central bankers can’t give two hoots about the best costume winner when they are accumulating gold reserves and diversifying their foreign exchange reserves.

These people and everyone who chooses to own gold, know that it will hold its value and act as a form of insurance and money in the months and years to come.

Give the gift of gold

February is the month of love and this year’s Oscars attendees will certainly be feeling it when they get hold of the 2017 Academy Awards’ infamous ‘Everyone Wins’ goody bags. Last year each of the gift bags were worth £232,000 and included (according to Forbes):

‘ a year's worth of Audi rentals ($45,000), 15-day private tour of Japan ($54,000), VIP all-inclusive trip to Israel ($55,000) and a lifetime's supply of Lizora skincare products ($31,200).’

This year the bags have even more bizarre, luxury products:
"including a female sex toy, the Nuelle Fiera Arouser for Her, deluxe Swiss toilet paper ..." according to the Telegraph.

The swag bags are provided by Distinctive Assets, whose Managing Director said "We are gifting them for the same reason that they are paid upwards of $20 million for a single film...because their personal brand has value as a commodity."

The commodity that is celebrity is (as we said early on) is very fickle and comes and goes with the tides. Gold, the ultimate commodity and money, is not.

Its shine has not been tarnished over the years and it still sees constant and universal demand.

This year, celebrities are not the only commodities that will be on show. A 14 carat gold and diamond OM bracelet is part of the swag bag. As we wrote earlier this month, gold jewellery is a bad investment when compared to a pure gold bar or sovereign coin. Demand for gold jewellery is falling and the resale price is appalling compared to the initial purchase price. Celebrities would be better served, if they were gifted with a few gold bars or coins which will hold their value, in contrast to a flimsy gold bracelet or bangle.

Who will win Best Picture this year?

Personally, I’m not going gaga over 'La La Land' like most people seem to be, so I’m rooting for 'Arrival'. But sometimes these things come down to personal preference.

Look out for our-post Oscars coverage next week. I’m afraid that doesn’t mean we’ll be giving you an actress-by-actress account of who wore what designer, instead we’ll be looking at the winning pictures and how much gold it takes to win an Oscar.

Interestingly the films nominated for this year’s Best Picture Award are diverse in their costs in terms of gold ounces. We will show you in previous years how much the price of movies has and hasn’t changed when it comes to spend in dollars and gold.

Conclusion

Celebrity, fame and awards all have their worth and they’re good fun for lots of people. In the same way, imagining what holding a solid gold Oscar in our hands would be like is also fun.

Winning an Oscar and being acknowledged for being a great actor would be wonderful. Winning a solid gold Oscar would be even better - a conversation starter and contrary to the Oscar 'regulations' in the event of financial crisis and collapse, it could be sold for close to its gold melt or spot value.

When it comes to protecting your life savings, or having essential financial insurance for a rainy day, we just think it’s better to own the good, timeless commodity and currency that are gold coins and bars.

But let’s be honest, most of us are unlikely to win any sort of Oscar - be it one made from base metal or investment grade gold bullion, and so a few gold coins or gold bars are better guarantees of wealth and financial security in the long-run.

Sign Up Here For Gold News, Research & Special Offers

Gold and Silver Bullion - News and Commentary

Gold steady post Fed minutes; focus on Trump economic policy (Reuters)

Asian stocks slide lower after Fed’s rate-hike uncertainty (MarketWatch)

Gold scores a boost after Fed minutes, following 3rd losing session (MarketWatch)

Dollar Falls With Stocks Amid Dovish Fed Minutes (Bloomberg)

Trump budget coming in mid-March, Spicer says (MarketWatch)

France exit the Euro?  Largest sovereign default in history would lead to contagion (CNBC)

The Mother Of All Financial Bubbles: "This Is The Very Definition Of Unsustainable" (Zerohedge)

Why the Royal Mint’s bullion sales were up big in January 2017 (Coin World)

Gold Looted From Ancient Empire Returned to Romania (National Geographic)

Gold’s Fundamentals Strengthen (The Daily Gold )

Gold Prices (LBMA AM)

23Feb: USD 1,237.35, GBP 992.97 & EUR 1,173.13 per ounce
22Feb: USD 1,237.50, GBP 994.21 & EUR 1,178.22 per ounce
21Feb: USD 1,228.70, GBP 988.86 & EUR 1,166.16 per ounce
20Feb: USD 1,235.35, GBP 991.49 & EUR 1,163.21 per ounce
17Feb: USD 1,241.40, GBP 1,000.57 & EUR 1,165.55 per ounce
16Feb: USD 1,236.75, GBP 988.41 & EUR 1,163.29 per ounce
15Feb: USD 1,225.15, GBP 985.27 & EUR 1,161.81 per ounce

Silver Prices (LBMA)

23Feb: USD 18.00, GBP 14.42 & EUR 17.06 per ounce
22Feb: USD 18.00, GBP 14.47 & EUR 17.14 per ounce
21Feb: USD 17.89, GBP 14.41 & EUR 16.97 per ounce
20Feb: USD 17.98, GBP 14.42 & EUR 16.92 per ounce
17Feb: USD 18.01, GBP 14.50 & EUR 16.91 per ounce
16Feb: USD 18.10, GBP 14.49 & EUR 17.02 per ounce
15Feb: USD 17.88, GBP 14.39 & EUR 16.94 per ounce


Recent Market Updates

- Gold To Benefit from Rising Inflation and Higher Than “Official” China Gold Demand
- Russia Gold Buying Is Back – Buys One Million Ounces In January
- Gold The “Ultimate Insurance Policy” as “Grave Concerns About Euro” – Greenspan
- Sharia Standard May See Gold Surge
- Gold Price To 2 Month High As Fiery Trump Declares World Order
- Gold’s Gains 15% In Inauguration Years Since 1974
- Turkey, ‘Axis of Gold’ and the End of US Dollar Hegemony
- Gold Up 5.5% YTD – Hard Brexit Cometh and Weaker Dollar Under Trump
- Bitcoin and Gold – Outlook and Safe Haven?
- Physical Gold Will ‘Trump’ Paper Gold
- Gold Lower Before Trump Presidency – Strong Gains Akin To After Obama Inauguration
- Gold Rallies To $1,207 After Trump Press Conference Shambles
- Prince Owned Land and Gold Bars Worth $800,000

Interested in learning more about physical gold and silver?
Call GoldCore and speak with a Gold and Silver Specialist today!

Saturday, February 25, 2017

POWERFUL GOLD & SILVER COILED SPRINGS: Important Charts You Have To See

Published here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-25/powerful-gold-silver-coiled-springs-important-charts-you-have-see

SRSrocco

By the SRSrocco Report,

According to the fundamentals, gold and silver are severely compressed coiled springs looking for an opportunity to release their tremendous power.  Yes, it is true, the precious metals still hold a great deal of power.  Which is why their prices are constantly controlled by market intervention.

Of course, the market intervention of gold and silver didn't start recently.  Oh no, this has been going on for quite some time.  Even though the Central Banks and Gadflies on the financial networks have been able to BAMBOOZLE the public into believing gold is a "Barbarous relic", fundamentals and the laws of nature can't be broken forever... as serious consequences normally follow.

When I read comments from supposedly intelligent people who believe gold is nothing more than a "13th century Middle Ages relic", and "that digital currency is the new future", what in the hell happened to IQ levels recently???

There seems to be this notion put forth by many in the Mainstream and Alternative media that "TECHNOLOGY" is going to save us all and be the new religion of the future.  While I have nothing against technology per say, it will not be the solution to our extremely serious energy predicament we are about to face head on.

For example, there are several voices out in the Alternative media suggesting that "Alien technology" will be finally released into the world, thus allowing our ADVANCED EMPIRE to continue indefinitely.  This of course would be a great benefit for Americans as it would allow them to continue filling their homes and rental storage units with all sorts crappy consumer products.

According to the supposed history of Alien encounters on the earth, they have been toying with humans for quite some time.  So, the idea that they will allow us to use some of their technology to save a species that shows such a high degree of IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, CRUELTY & GREED, doesn't pass the smell test to me.

Hold on.. I can take that a step further,  How many EMPIRES have come and gone in the past??  Okay, we had the Egyptian, Persian, Roman and Mayan Empires to name a few.  You would think if Aliens were going to start saving humans from being the POOR UNWORTHY SLOBS they have been for thousands of years, they would have done so already.  Wouldn't they??

But, maybe we finally passed the test for our species, and now the Aliens think we deserve a break.... just like a freshly opened bottle of Coke.  Yes, that's it.  We have passed the test of being WISE, PRUDENT, CARING and GENEROUS with one another, the plant and animals... and let's not forget the environment.

On the other hand, logic suggests we are about to hit another SENECA CLIFF just like all the other prior empires that dried up and blew away.... and quite quickly, I may add.  So, even though there may be more intelligent life forms roaming the galaxy, it doesn't seem quite likely they are going to waste much time on a species that has totally run AMUCK.

Which means, we little people here on earth are going to have to take it upon ourselves to continue on-wards when the GREATEST FINANCIAL PONZI SCHEME finally pops.  And pop it will.

The Gold & Silver Coiled Springs... Storing Tremendous Power

Over the years, monetary power shifted away from the precious metals and over to the FIAT MONETARY REGIME (a debt-based worthless paper currency system).  This stared long ago, but if we have to put a date on it, it would be 1969.  I will get into the particulars in an upcoming article.  However, the notion (again) that gold is a "13th century Barbarous relic" fails to consider that the world ran on a Gold-Backed U.S. Dollar system up until 1971.  This wasn't that long ago.

Moreover, we still used silver in our coinage up until 1965.  While some silver coins, such as the Kennedy Half Dollar, were still minted for the general public up until 1969, silver was removed from U.S. coinage in 1965.

The real reason that silver was finally removed from U.S. coinage in 1965, was that it was too valuable to be used as money.... LOL.  I know that sounds silly, but that is the truth.  Now, when I say "money", I mean what it has degraded to over the past 50 years.

There just wasn't enough silver to go around to meet the insatiable demand coming from the expanding industrial and jewelry sectors.  To use silver in coinage as well as supply future industrial and jewelry demand... there just wasn't enough of the shiny metal.

This is exactly what President Lyndon Johnson stated during his comments after signing the 1965 Coinage Act:

Now, all of you know these changes are necessary for a very simple reason--silver is a scarce material. Our uses of silver are growing as our population and our economy grows. The hard fact is that silver consumption is now more than double new silver production each year. So, in the face of this worldwide shortage of silver, and our rapidly growing need for coins, the only really prudent course was to reduce our dependence upon silver for making our coins.

Well, there you have it.  While the grand conspiracy that silver was removed from currency to give more power to the elite may hold some truth, the REAL REASON was much more simple.  There just wasn't enough silver to go around.

Furthermore, I really don't believe the elite are really as smart and clever as some make them out to be.  Again, if we go back in history and look at all the EMPIRES that have come and gone, you would think that the elite would have had a better plan than allow everything to go to hell in a hand-basket... time after time.

We must remember, back in day when the world was using silver as money, life was a lot simpler.  There were no cell phones, or I-pads.  There were no electronics or solar panels that required silver.  Rather, we basically spent most of our time walking around dressed in glorified burlap sack clothing, growing food or producing simple consumer goods, while enjoying a bath once a week.  Gosh, how times have changed.

Regardless, the days of the Fiat Monetary Regime are numbered.  There's just too much debt and derivatives over-hanging the system to allow us to continue for much longer.  Thus, in order to keep the Fiat Monetary Regime alive, the value of REAL MONEY, such as gold or silver, has to be kept in the DARK.

If we look at the following two charts, we can plainly see that gold and silver are both standing at the doorway of a major inflection point:

Gold Long Term chart

Silver Long Term Chart

Normally, I don't pay much attention to "Technical Analysis", but in this case, we are on the verge of a very critical technical breakout.  Of course, this is more important for Hedge Funds, Institutions and large traders to follow, but in both charts, the gold and silver price remained above the 50 MA (50 month Moving Average) for a decade.

However, when QE3 was announced at the end of 2012, Central Bank liquidity made its way into stocks, bonds and real estate.  The precious metals were left out to dry.

If we recall from the quote above when Lyndon Johnson stated that silver was a scarce material over 50 years ago, it's even more scarce today.  The same with gold.  When the gold and silver prices were knocking on the DOOR to reach new highs in 2012, this just could not stand.

Which is precisely why both gold and silver's 50 MA level (RED LINE) and have fallen below and stayed there for the past four years.  However, both precious metals are once again tapping up against that 50 MA.  They first tapped up against the 50 MA in 2016... for good reason.

When the Dow Jones Index was scaring the living hell out of the markets by rapidly falling in the beginning of 2016, investors were getting a HINT of PRECIOUS METALS RELIGION.  Thus, investors flocked into gold and silver (gold and blue colored lines) in a big way, pushing their prices up as the Dow Jones Index fell nearly 1,000 points during five trading days in the beginning of February 2016:

Dow Jones Chart

This isn't rocket science.  FEAR provides an excellent motivation for bringing people back to their senses.  However, this was just for a short while as the Fed and Central Banks ramped up their stock and bond purchases.  God only knows just how insane this amount must be.

Thus, calm was brought back into the markets allowing investors to go back to being TOTALLY INSANE once again.  Unfortunately, duct tape, baling wire and hot air cannot keep a market from succumbing to the fundamental laws of real economics.

The Dow Jones Index is so inflated, it's overvalued by at least 60%.... for starters:

Dow Jones Correction

According to the economic contraction cycle that occurs about every six years, the Dow Jones Index is severely overdue for a good 'ole fashion beating.  If we assume that a normal correction for the Dow Jones would be for it to fall to about 8,000 points, the index is overvalued by at least 60%.   And that is just for starters.

As I have mentioned in previous articles, where we are heading is nothing like anything we have experienced before.  Well sure, we could go back and look at the remains of the Egyptian, Persian, Roman and Mayan Empires for clues, but this would not be a good topic to bring up at the next family gathering or office party.

We must remember, most Americans are way too busy spending money they don't have on crap that they really don't need, to be bothered with the TRUTH that we are going to go head over the SENECA CLIFF, and there isn't anything to stop it.

For all those who are new to the alternative media, the SENECA CLIFF came from the work of an ancient Roman philosopher, named Lucius Seneca.  According to Lucius Seneca (published on Ugo Bardi's blog):

increases are of sluggish growth, but the way to ruin is rapid." Lucius Anneaus Seneca, Letters to Lucilius, n. 91

Seneca Cliff

Like it or not, we will most certainly experience the ramifications of the SENECA CLIFF in the future.  Unfortunately, technology will not save us from this fate.  Rather, the more technology we use to try to solve our dire energy predicament, the worse the cliff dive will be.  I discussed this in my article, CONTINENTAL RESOURCES: Example Of What Is Horribly Wrong With The U.S. Shale Oil Industry.

While I am being a broken record on this subject matter, I continue to receive new subscribers every day on the site.  Furthermore, the more individuals look at this data and information, the more LIGHT BULBS go off.  It takes time for this stuff to sink in.  Heck, it has taken me years to come to this realization.

Lastly, the value of gold and silver are going to skyrocket in the future.  However, I have no idea how bad things are going to be when the PHAT DEBT LADY finally sings.  But, at least physical precious metals will offer much better options in the future rather than 99% of the STOCK, BOND and REAL ESTATE liabilities out there which are masquerading as assets.

Lastly, if you haven't checked out our new PRECIOUS METALS INVESTING section or our new LOWEST COST PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE page, I highly recommend you do.

Check back for new articles and updates at the SRSrocco Report.

Friday, February 24, 2017

David Morgan Exclusive: Watch What Happens When Silver Hits $26…

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/david-morgan-exclusive-watch-happens-silver-hits-26/

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome in our good friend David Morgan of The Morgan Report. David, thanks so much for joining us. It’s great to have you on, as always. How are you doing so far here in 2017?

David Morgan: I’m doing pretty good, Mike. It’s great to be on your show. Thank you very much.

Mike Gleason: Well, as we begin here, David, we’re off to another solid start to the year in the precious metals markets. Things look quite similar today to where they did a year ago. We also saw some early momentum in 2016.

So, what have been the key drivers, in your view, thus far in the metals markets, particularly the white metals, silver, platinum, palladium, which have all outperformed gold to this point. What’s behind the advance?

David Morgan: A couple of things. It’s a lot like last year, I think.

First of all, there’s always some contingent of people that are looking for a safe haven or a hedge, and of course that ebbs and flows with market conditions and perception. However, long term investors realize that the financial situation on a global basis, the debt structure, is unsolvable. So, I think there’s that and there’s always people that are adding to that. There’s people that invest too much or expect the market … the gold market or the silver market to move at a certain place, and it doesn’t. So again, it ebbs and flows.

As far as the white metals are concerned, it’s pretty interesting. Number one is that platinum has been under the price of gold for months now, which is highly unusual. I mean with my 40 years’ experience in the metal markets, when platinum reaches a discount to gold, usually it’s a lead pipe cinch trade. You just basically arb(itrage) it.

You go long platinum, short gold and within usually a few months you are in the profit zone. Not true this time. Part of it has to do with the Volkswagen no-no with the T.D.I. with their diesel engine, and the platinum and palladium’s are used in the catalytic converters for gas and diesel. And that’s part of it.

The other part of it is seasonality. I used to trade platinum and palladium quite a bit and there is a seasonality in the first of the year for both white metals. In fact, it’s almost a sure thing, of course there’s no such thing as a sure thing. So that’s part of it as well. There’s a seasonality.

And if you look at the fundamentals … I mean platinum is under the cost of production, most of it comes from South Africa. Their mines are a mess. Their workforce is a mess. They have a lot of problems. And so that puts some upward pressure on the price of platinum, at some point in time. But it really hasn’t become real robust. I mean obviously as you said it’s outperforming gold, but not what I consider in a significant way.

So, Mike, I latch to your thought. Look, we’re going to see a seasonality of gold and silver, and I thought it would go a month or two. And that’s where I started the report in January when I put it out. And I’m a good believer that the market knows more than anyone, regardless of the reasons, regardless of commitment of traders, anything.

So, if you listen to the market it will help you a great deal as far as how long the trade will take place et cetera. What I did was I let the market tell me where it was going last year and we got to the point where gold and silver were doing really well in the summer, which is unusual, it’s different, than their normal seasonality.

And I started to look at the commitment of trades closer and closer and closer, and I picked a point where I was highly uncomfortable. The sentiment was very, very high. And I chose that as a point to off the trade.

So, what I do is I keep 75% invested and trade with 25% at the maximum and I like to book profits. And in this new next little market that we’re in, it really in my opinion, strong one, it behooves you to be able to trade, because the ebbs and flows are going to be rather dramatic. So, if you can trade with part of your portfolio you can increase your gains.

So, what I have said all that to say this Mike, and thanks for listening so well. I am just going to do the exact same thing again this year and hopefully I’ll get it right again. Which means, the market is tenuous, the gold commitment traders looks more favorable than the silver one. There’s a lot of my friends saying silver’s going to go in the short squeeze eminently.

I don’t see that, but it doesn’t mean they’re wrong and I’m right, it just means I don’t see it, and they may see something I don’t. But I’m just going to let the market tell me. I think we’ve got more upside than both the metals. But I do not think we’re going to go all the way into the summer, like we did last year. I think we’re probably going to go, I’m guessing now, another month or so.

And of course, I will update premium members on the website. That’s what it’s all about, because I do it real time and draw the graph and explain what’s going on, and also how the market reacts, in other words, if we get to this point here, I’ll draw a line I get the number, then the market is telling us the game is over and you should take your profits.

I got everyone in suggested as a $16.60 basis to spot market. If you look at $16.60 on the chart and where we are now, most of those people that took that piece of education that I gave out of where I would enter, are pretty happy right now.

Mike Gleason: Yeah. Absolutely. Now, there are some that don’t think we’re necessarily still in a bull market, so talk about this idea that we’re hearing from some of the bearish analysts who say, that the first half of last year where we saw a very strong advance in the metals, as you eluded to, was nothing more than a bear trap, we remain in a longer term down trending market for gold and silver. That was just a blip, what’s what they’ve said. I know you’re calling for a strong year for gold and silver, so what is your response to the notion that these rallies are just fool’s gold so to speak?

David Morgan: Yeah. Great question and thanks for that. I mean, as you know, I sent this article to you, one of the few, I don’t write many articles for the public domain. I usually just do the interviews and post them on our blog and mail them out to our e-mail list.

But, I was asked to do an exclusive. I sent it to you and I started off by stating… “I have spending most of my life watching, writing, speaking, trading and investing, and listening to almost everything we do in the precious metals markets given that there’s several incites that you, the market, have provided me over and over again and at a level rising my conviction into what happens in these markets.”

And I went on and said in that article that we are in a situation where I do believe with everything I learned and know, that we are not in a bear trap, as you’ve talked about. We are in a new bull market, and I’m putting pretty much my reputation on the line. And I eluded to these others people that say what you just said, “That there’s going to be a new low ahead.”

I don’t see it. There’s a few reasons. One of them is, that silver is leading gold. That’s one reason. Another reason is the volumes were vast last year. I’m not talking about 2017. I’m talking about all of the year 2016.

Another thing is where was it on a year-over-year basis? The leading group of stocks that was the best year-over-year for 2016 were the mining sector.

In other words, from January 1st 2016 to December 31st, 2016, the number one performing sector was the mining stocks. And that was almost round trip because we went up, up, up, up, through the summer. I sold right at the top for the trading part of the portfolio and then we went down, down, down, down, down into the end of the year. And even with it coming down, it was the best performing asset.

So, I really don’t see it going lower. And these guys that are right … I made fun of myself for this article. I said, “If I’m wrong throw it up on your favorite Twitter feed.” I don’t care. I mean, a lot of this stuff is probability.

I was asked to give the forecast for what will the silver price be in 2017. I did this time what the banks do. I took it a little more seriously because I kind of look to be seen as some kind of a joke.

What I for my paid people is far more meaningful because I can get a better handle on it. Going a year out is pretty hard. What you do is least squares linear regression. I did a least squares linear regression. It’s just a curve fitting math formula you learn like your first year in advanced math.

So, it came out $22 is the high band … like a Bollinger Band… $22 at the high, $16 at the low. And I said, I’m bullish. I’m taking the high. Twenty-two bucks for this year.”

So, that kind of summarizes that part of it Mike. If I’m wrong I’m going to be … First of all, take it like a man. Secondly, I will be astonished. If we had that rise in price on week volume and the Drukenmillers and some of these big funds were buying gold hand over fist then I would say, “I’m going to pause and I’m going wait and see. And I’m just going to be neutral.” But that’s not what we saw.

What we saw last year was big money coming in a big way in large volumes. And that’s when the price moved up.

Mike Gleason: Let’s dig a little bit more into some of the primary catalysts here. What are you watching for in terms of some of the geo-political events and some developments in the global financial markets that could have you re-evaluating your outlook for 2017 and beyond to be even more bullish. Share a bit about those potential catalysts for higher prices.

David Morgan: Well, fortunately we have new administration that in my opinion may not take a long-term view and is looking more reactionary than forbearing into what the meaning of uncertain legislation or edict is. So, let me rephrase that.

We have a lot of problems in the United States and in the world … had a lot of problems globally. Now, most of them center around the banking system having a debt based monetary system. And that’s really what needs to be addressed because we cannot grow our way out of this mess.

And trying to do that may be something that gets people excited. It may put more people to work and it may even improve the infrastructure. And I’m not against any of those things. But as far as the core value that’s really going to have a meaningful impact on humanity, there really is no such thing right now, because the problem really hasn’t been addressed. It’s putting the lipstick on the pig. Excuse the over-used metaphor.

So, this is the situation. So, what I see is if there is more tension and it looks like there certainly could be between, let’s say China and United States or Mexico and the United States. And we start doing what happened in the ‘30s with Smoot-Hawley, in other words, more protectionism and more, “Me first, you second,” and that kind of an attitude it will grow tension wise between nation states. And it will have economic repercussions.

Now, we’re already seeing a contraction in the overall economy so I am a bit … more than a bit. I am concerned how this will unravel. It’s going to unravel one way or another. That is inevitable. That’s a mathematical certainty. The problem is you want it to unravel where you can stay ahead of the flood. In other words, there’s another metaphor, if the water starts rising in the river, you’re going to pack up the kids and the wife and the essentials. Get the car and get away from it.

But if that flood is a flash flood, you’re going to look out your window and all of the sudden the river is two feet in your house and there is nothing you can do about it. That is a metaphor for what I see potentially happening. And that’s not a good place to be because then you’re going to get over reaction on the other direction, which means you might get into further currency wars.

You’re going to have a hard time … Once the flood is taken over, the flash flood, it’s impossible to make it go away and, again, maybe that is a corny metaphor but I mean it. I really want people to picture this in their heads because, Mike, I am more concerned that we are moving too fast in an ever-changing world that could have repercussions that we look back on and say, “Oh my goodness. We should have waited before we did that.”

Does that make sense?

Mike Gleason: Yeah. That’s a good answer and I echo those concerns as well. It does seem like a very tenuous situation and who knows what it’s going to take to get to that tipping point.

Expanding on the point here a little bit … the market for physical metal is transitioned a bit with the election of Donald Trump. Many of our customers are more optimistic today than they were under President Obama, which is certainly understandable. But that does not mean that precious metals will not do well. Especially with rising debts and increasing global tensions and a Trump administration that has been saying they want the dollar to weaken.

So, what are your thoughts on the need or lack thereof for physical bullion given the new administration.

David Morgan: Well, it’s so interesting that it’s being objective and it’s something I strive to do. I certainly cannot do in the precious metals market. I’m just way to involved in it. But, if you look at people that can be objective you can look at Evan and Associates, who did a study years ago, on portfolio balance. There’s a Harvard study and there is a recent one done by CPM Group.

And all three of those studies come to the exact same conclusion that regardless of economic condition, regardless of what’s going on in the debt markets or the equity markets, having precious metals in your portfolio will give you better overall performance.

Wow. What a concept. So, that means if you’re super bullish, everything’s wonderful, and nothing’s wrong with the world, you should have some precious metals in your portfolio. If you are on the other extreme and think we might go another week before the whole thing collapses, you should have some precious metals in your portfolio.

So, it’s basically something that is meaningful to get you the best performance under all economic conditions and yet most people are never taught this at all. The reason being is that Wall Street really doesn’t make much money in the gold and silver markets. They make their money in the equity and the bond markets. But, they’ll come around and probably more on the equity side, which means you’ll see more of the resource stocks. Something that we spend a great deal of time doing in The Morgan Report.

But, the studies that I’m mentioning is not resource stocks. It is not gold companies. It is physical metals. That’s what they’re talking about.

Mike Gleason: Leads me right into my next question talking about mining stocks. You’ve been spending a lot of time with mining company executives lately, both one on one at their mines and also at investment conferences. What’s the outlook in the miners at this point?

David Morgan: Considerably bullish. I mean most of them are convinced, like me, that the worst is behind us and we are going up, but not rapidly. A lot of the people that were marginal in the business, meaning they had projects that were profitable at $25 silvers are gone. People that were profitable at $1,650 gold, they’re gone.

So, the markets consolidated, which is actually healthy in some respects. And projects are getting funded. There is more cash available for projects to be furthered. And again, mildly bullish. I think that all these companies have gotten leaner and meaner. They’ve all pretty much cut their margins to, for all practical purposes as much as possible. And, they are optimistic but it’s not like the early days at the beginning of the bull market.

When you go back to the 2003, 4’s, and 5’s … I mean there was like a buzz when you walked into an investment conference, be it a retail conference or an investment conference of professionals, it was humming. It was buzzing. Everyone just sort of knew that the bull market had started in a significant way. It’s not that kind of feel at all. It’s a feel like, okay, the best of the best have remained. There’s good deals out there. Let’s seek them out. Let’s use our money wisely.

And there is a few like me that are thinking two to three years from now … or maybe a year from now, I don’t know. I’m actually thinking more sooner than later. The buzz is going to get back to the early days of this bull market because, unfortunately, these debt problems can’t be solved so it will be a lot of money drawn into this sector over the next few years.

Mike Gleason: Talking about when we were fully in that bull market just a few years ago, another thing I was reading recently involved a prediction you made back in 2011. You made the case that when silver reached $30 an ounce the public would buy more silver above that level than they would below it and you think that’s going to happen again one day.

Talk about why you think that will be the case. It’s an important point because many would guess that the public would be selling silver if the price got to that level, not buying. Give us your thoughts there.

David Morgan: Yeah. Well, when it happened the first time there was a lot of buying about $30. And if you look at a chart, silver stayed above $30 for about a year. In fact, if the silver was able to stay above $30 from then on you would have great margins for the better silver companies like some that are on the New York Stock Exchange and on the NASDAQ. I’m not talking about those speculative types of companies.

And they don’t have great margins to be able to expand. And you have a really good situation. Unfortunately, that’s not what happened. So, when we get back to $30 there will be some amount of people who bought it at $30 that will say, “Oh, I hate silver. It’s finally back. I’m selling my silver.”

So, you’ll get calls from some of your people that will say, “Mike, I want to sell back my, whatever it is, silver.” And of course, you make a two-way market and that will take place. But, you’ll also have a lot of new buyers. And, the reason being is once it gets over the $25, $26 level … and I’m just using that as a guess. I think it’s a good guess … The psychology in the market will change.

And a lot of people that had given up on silver will become some of its biggest advocates again. And you’ll get a lot of free publicity all throughout the internet about why silver is the greatest and best, about why it’s going to outperform gold, why it’s affordable and all the arguments that we’ve gone over and beat to death.

They’ll come out from new mouths and they’ll go onto new websites. They’ll be in new places on Facebook and all the sudden the silver story will explode into new niches that it’s never been exposed to before. So, they’ll be many new buyers for every seller that just wants to break even at $30 silver that will overwhelm the market.

Now that pre-supposes that they’ll be enough going on economically that buzz will be taking place. But that’s how markets move so I’m nearly certain that’s what we’ll see. So, you’ll see this overwhelming thing and then the people that sold at $30 they’ll say “oh, its hit resistance.” It could take two weeks. It could take two months. It’s not going to take two years. It’ll take some amount of time to work through that level and then maybe the next one up. There’ll be some that bought it at $40 … “Oh man, if it hits $40 I’ve got to get rid of this stuff.”

And then once it’s in a new high, once it gets to $40 and above everybody will buy it … I shouldn’t say everybody. Many people will buy it at that new high because it’s like, “Wow. I’m going to miss it. It’s too late, silver’s going to go to $100. Look at the ratio.” They’ll know all the arguments from these new niches, these new places where they’re getting the silver story for the first time and they will believe that they can’t lose.

And then they’ll jump in the market. Silver is such a tiny, little, bitty market any new buying will drive the price higher and higher and higher. And people that hold at a profit won’t sell because they don’t know how high is high. So, we’ll see another move like we saw in 2011 where it went from $19 to $26, stalled out for a little while … and then from $26 to $48. And I made that trade. Everybody that was on my premium service saw me make it and the ones that followed me into it were super happy that I called the top on that.

We are going to see that again accept for this time I think we are talking about a move that’s even higher than the $50 level. But, again, I will try to remain humbled by the markets. The markets have humbled me many times and that means that it’s possible that, one, it might not go higher than that or, two, that it will act differently than I just outlined.

But I’m pretty sure it will be close to that.

Mike Gleason: You’ve written a book advising people on the types of things that they can do when we get to that point so as we start to wrap up here, David, talk about some of the things that you’re working on there at The Morgan Report and then, also about that recent book that you and David Smith just released titled, Second Chance: How to Make and Keep Big Money During the Coming Gold and Silver Shock Wave. And then anything else you think people ought to be considering as we move throughout the year.

David Morgan: Well, I’ll start on the book. One thing that’s really disheartening to me is many retail investors. They’ll do what’s called a round trip. They’ll buy a stock. Great gold company. Great silver company and a few other lithium and cobalt and some of the stuff that we do in the report.

And they’ll go up and up and up and they’re happy and tell all their friends and then they just hold it and watch it come all the way back down to where they bought it. That is not what you do as an investor. And so, the book, Second Chance is all about different techniques and how to overcome the tendency that some people have to not take a profit. So, we have several techniques like scaling out and whatever.

And of course, you know my biggest and hardest job will be to call top again. I’ve been very good at it so far. I don’t want to say that too often. I don’t believe in jinxing myself or whatever. But calling it exact top is an amateur’s game. Think you can do that again and again and again, no way. No one can. I’ve been lucky … I’ll use the word luck that I have done it every time.

And mostly it comes from running in this business because when we get a plethora of new subscribers that’s way beyond what we get in an average day or week, that tells me, “Uh oh. Darn it. We’re getting to the top.” And that was one of the factors that I used in calling the top the last time.

As far as what’s going on in The Morgan Report… this is something that was said to me 25 years ago, and I actually didn’t like it when I heard it, but it’s true. One of these gold miners is talking at the Society of Mining Engineers, the S.M.E. Small group and all these guys were pretty rough characters. Nice people but you know, hard workers. And one old guy came up to me and he said, “Man, I’ve made so much more money in the paper silver market than I’ve ever made in silver.”

And I thought, “I don’t like that really.” But you know what? He’s right. I mean you get so much leverage in the mining shares. I’m not talking about futures and options or ETFs, which certainly can make a lot more there on the moves up and down. But the mining sector, some of these stocks just do phenomenally well. In fact, I was going to write an article for the public domain talking about, “Did you catch the move to $50 silver in 2016?”

I’d probably got some eye balls on it, Mike, they’d go, “What the hell is Mike talking about now?” And what I’m talking about is one of our top tier picks … first of all, we picked out in 2016 in the January issue. Our best stocks for the year. And guess what? We hit the nail on the head with all of them accept one.

Our performance was like 215%. That’s not even close to the IBD percentage that I outlined earlier in the interview. There’s is I think 56, which I’m doing from memory. You can check my facts. It’s the idea that’s more important than the exact number. But we were beating the IBD. index by a huge factor like 2, 3, 400%.

Anyway, there was one company, it was one of our fittest. It went from like $4.14 up to like $19 and change. So that’s the equivalent percentage wise with silver going from a very low level up to a very, very high level on percentage terms. So, that shows you that the right silver stock can perform much better percentage wise, and be up a factor of four or five-fold. Whereas, if you bought the silver, which did well during the year, there’s no doubt about it…

It started at off $14 low in early December 2015, and then the stocks bottomed over the 19th of January, 2016. And then we were off to the races for a while. So, I think a balance is what’s important. You know people say, “You push this and you push that.” Well, I push balance. If you don’t have metals, real physical metals that you can get at Money Metals Exchange … Get a good dealer. One you can trust. One that delivers what they say there are going to. One that stands behind their products. One that makes a two-way market. One that helps educate their clients. Everything you do at a Money Metals Exchange Mike.

You and Stefan have been good friends of mine. Never had anyone come back to me and say… I mean, everyone’s come back and said, “I’m glad I sent you there.” And I spread it around, you know that because I know most of the major dealers on the wholesale and the retail side.

But you know, you do it right. My point is that if you don’t have physical precious metals, I don’t want your business. If you do and you want to go to the next level of making money where you can do more in the paper markets than you can in the physical markets but, you own physical, which is the most important part, then certainly look at The Morgan Report. And I give them a free chance. In other words, you can get on a free list and with our free list we write every weekend something that either I compose or it comes out on The Morgan Report.

We try to make it beneficial to everyone that reads our work. And it is not The Morgan Report. Membership has its privileges. Membership means you are a membership part of the website, which is a protected, password enabled portion that has vast amounts of information. Not only the monthly Morgan Report, but the videos I do on an as required basis talking about the commitment of traders, how the markets are set up, why the bond market is about to fall off, why the bond market has peaked, why we’re in a distribution pattern in the stock market, why the market ended up now to make everybody feel good, what it’s going to look like further out and on and on it goes.

So, and the other thing that I felt was very important because I try to put myself in the buyer’s shoes … You know what I really want in a newsletter … and I’ve seen them all. I was a newsletter junky in my twenties and early thirties and I’ve seen most of these guys and what they’ve produced. I just didn’t want to do that. I wanted to give a whole different fresh outlook on the sector.

Well, when I write a question to them I want them to answer so we guarantee that we will answer all of our paid members, whatever question write. Now, they’re limited to two a month, which is pretty generous really. And they can ask us darn near anything. But a lot of times it’s on something that we’ve covered in The Morgan Report, and then we put that question to Letters to the Editor and we answer it for everybody’s benefit. And on it goes. So, it’s one part of being a member of The Morgan Report that I would want. I would want the person I was paying to be responsible to me and if I had a question I certainly would want to get an answer.

Mike Gleason: Well, it’s fantastic stuff for sure and I can say with great confidence that if you are going to invest in mining stocks, don’t do it alone. You need to take the advice of a trusted analyst like David Morgan and the team he has there.

It’s very worthwhile if that’s a market that you’re going to play in. Obviously, get the physical first. We both agree on that. But David and his team can certainly help you navigate those waters in the mining stocks because it’s not easy to do on your own if you don’t really know what you’re doing.

Well, David, great stuff as usual. We always appreciate hearing your thoughtful analyzes and your level-headed approach to these markets. Thanks so much for taking the time and for providing the service that you do there. We certainly wish you all the best and look forward to catching up with you again very soon.

David Morgan: Well, thank you Mike. Appreciate it.

Mike Gleason: That will do it for this week. Thanks again to David Morgan, publisher of The Morgan Report. To follow David just visit TheMorganReport.com. We urge everyone at the very least to go ahead and sign up for the free e-mail list and start getting some of his commentary on a regular basis. And if you haven’t already, check out The Silver Manifesto and now his new book as well titled Second Chance: How to Make and Keep Big Money During the Coming Gold Silver Shock Wave. Both of which are available on the Money Metals website and other places where books are sold. Be sure to check those out.

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

The post David Morgan Exclusive: Watch What Happens When Silver Hits $26… appeared first on Gold Silver Worlds.