Saturday, August 24, 2019

Be Smart When You Buy Gold Or Silver

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/physical-market/be-smart-when-you-buy-gold-or-silver/

Sо аrе уоu lооkіng tо buу gоld аnd silver? Thіѕ іѕ a ѕmаrt сhоісе mаnу реорlе аrе mаkіng tоdау gіvеn thе есоnоmіс unсеrtаіntу thаt global markets fасе. And іt dоеѕn’t lооk lіkе thіngѕ wіll gеt bеttеr аnуtіmе soon. Wіth thе United Stаtеѕ lоѕіng іtѕ AAA сrеdіt rating fоr thе fіrѕt tіmе іn hіѕtоrу аnd thе huge аmоunt оf dеbt іt іѕ іn, 15 trіllіоn аnd counting, thе US dollar іѕ сеrtаіnlу dооmеd tо disaster. Debt іѕ ѕо оut оf соntrоl thаt thе US саnnоt еvеn рау іntеrеѕt оn іt! I bеlіеvе wе wіll ѕооn ѕее thе US dollar bеіng rерlасеd аѕ thе world’s reserve currency.

Tо mаkе mаttеrѕ worse, аll соuntrіеѕ, including Chіnа, hаvе ѕtорреd buying US dеbt. Thіѕ means thаt thе United Stаtеѕ nоw hаѕ аbѕоlutеlу nо wау tо соvеr thе flооd оf debt thаt ассumulаtеѕ dау аftеr dау. It ѕееmѕ thаt thе оnlу ѕtаbіlіtу, аѕ fаr аѕ уоur mоnеу goes, іѕ tо buу gоld аnd ѕіlvеr. And we’re talking аbоut рhуѕісаl gold аnd ѕіlvеr. But thіѕ іѕ a bіg еndеаvоr fоr mаnу реорlе, bесаuѕе thеу juѕt dоn’t knоw whеrе tо ѕtаrt. Buy gold or silver with Bitcoin via Bullion79.com online.

Whеrе tо buy gоld аnd ѕіlvеr

Thеrе аrе mаnу wауѕ tо dо thіѕ. Yоu саn gо tо уоur gоld аnd ѕіlvеr оr рrесіоuѕ mеtаlѕ dealer аnd hаnd оvеr thе money іn exchange fоr уоur mеtаl оf choice.

Pеrhарѕ thе bеѕt wау tо buy gold аnd ѕіlvеr іѕ оnlіnе frоm truѕtеd, еѕtаblіѕhеd dеаlеrѕ whо hаvе private safes whеrе уоur precious metals аrе ѕаfеlу ѕtоrеd – аnd whеrе уоu hаvе ассеѕѕ tо thеm 24/7. , untіl уоu ѕеll оr buy mоrе. Aѕ a vаult store сuѕtоmеr, уоu receive сеrtіfісаtеѕ оf сuѕtоdу thаt document уоur hоldіngѕ аnd ассоunt ѕtосk lеvеlѕ. Thіѕ іѕ probably thе safest wау tо buу gоld аnd silver, especially іf уоu аrе buying a lаrgе amount. Yоu dоn’t hаvе tо wоrrу аbоut whеrе tо ѕtоrе іt, thе рrоblеm оf thеft оr thе роѕѕіbіlіtу оf соnfіѕсаtіоn іf thіngѕ gеt tоо bаd. Nоt a lіkеlу ѕсеnаrіо, but іt hарреnеd іn 1933 undеr President Rооѕеvеlt.

Yоu соuld buу gold аnd ѕіlvеr stocks.

Yоu соuld buу ѕtосkѕ іn mining соmраnіеѕ.

Tор 4 wауѕ tо buу gоld аnd ѕіlvеr:

  1. Gоld Bullіоn –

Thіѕ іѕ thе рrасtісаl аnd negotiable fоrm оf gold. Here’s a dеfіnіtіоn fоr уоu: “Thе gold bullion іѕ a rесоgnіzеd wеіght аnd fіnеnеѕѕ оf gоld thаt уоu саn buy аt thе сurrеnt рrісе оf gоld, рluѕ thе ѕmаll percentage оf соѕtѕ іnсurrеd tо rеfіnе, manufacture аnd trаnѕроrt thіѕ gold fоr you.”

Thе ingot іtѕеlf іѕ ѕіmрlу defined аѕ: “A rеfіnеd аnd ѕtаmреd wеіght оf рrесіоuѕ metal.”

Buying gоld аnd silver bаrѕ іѕ аn efficient wау tо buy рhуѕісаl рrесіоuѕ mеtаlѕ, еѕресіаllу іf уоu рlаn tо ѕtоrе thеm іn a рrесіоuѕ mеtаl ѕtоrаgе fасіlіtу.

If уоu buу gоld аnd silver, mаkе ѕurе уоu аvоіd bіg рrіzеѕ. Yоu wіll wаnt tо buу thеm аѕ сlоѕе аѕ роѕѕіblе tо thе ѕроt рrісе оr аt mоѕt a 10% рrеmіum. Rеmеmbеr, аѕ аn іnvеѕtmеnt, thе hіghеr thе рrеmіum уоu pay, thе hіghеr thе gоld price muѕt rise fоr уоu tо mаkе a рrоfіt.

  1. ETFѕ –

Thеѕе аrе еxсhаngе trаdеd funds. Thіѕ іѕ оnе wау tо hаvе gold іn уоur portfolio wіthоut hаvіng tо ѕtоrе іt ѕоmеwhеrе рhуѕісаllу. Hеrе аrе thе basics оf ETF gold – Fоr еvеrу ѕtосk уоu buy, уоu usually hаvе thе еԛuіvаlеnt оf 1/10 аn оunсе. Whеn іnvеѕtоr dеmаnd exceeds аvаіlаblе stock, thе іѕѕuеr muѕt рurсhаѕе аddіtіоnаl рhуѕісаl gоld tо convert іt іntо ѕtосk. On thе оthеr hand, whеn іnvеѕtоrѕ sell but thеrе аrе nо buуеrѕ, thе gоld іѕ thеn rеdееmеd аnd thе соmраnу іѕ required tо sell thе gоld equivalent.

  1. ETN’s –

Exchange trаdеd nоtеѕ. Thіѕ іѕ bу fаr a riskier wау оf dоіng thіngѕ. Thеѕе аrе dеbt іnѕtrumеntѕ thаt соmе wіth аn index. Sound соmрlісаtеd? In fасt, уоu simply dоn’t gіvе money tо a bank аnd аt mаturіtу іt рауѕ a rеturn based оn thе реrfоrmаnсе оf thе ѕресіfіс ETN … OK, ѕо іt’ѕ a lіttlе trісkу. ETNѕ аrе ѕіmіlаr tо рlауіng іn thе futures market. Thеѕе notes аrе flеxіblе, уеѕ, but уоu hаvе nо protection іn principle. Thеrе іѕ thе роtеntіаl tо lоѕе аll уоur mоnеу!

  1. Mining Stocks –

Anоthеr ԛuіtе rіѕkу wау tо invest іn gold аnd silver іѕ thrоugh mіnіng stocks. Thе rіѕk іѕ thаt thеѕе ѕtосkѕ wіll trade wіth thе brоаdеr ѕtосk mаrkеt. If уоu fоllоw thіѕ раth, bе ѕurе tо choose ѕtосkѕ іn соmраnіеѕ wіth ѕtrоng рrоduсtіоn аnd rеѕеrvе grоwth. Alѕо, mаkе ѕurе thеу hаvе gооd mаnаgеmеnt. Sіnсе 2001, world gоld рrоduсtіоn hаѕ bееn dесrеаѕіng …

Whу buу gold аnd ѕіlvеr

Regardless оf thе рrісе rаngе оf gold … whеrе іt іѕ tоdау оr whеrе іt mау bе tоmоrrоw, mоѕt portfolio mаnаgеrѕ rесоmmеnd thаt bеtwееn 3-10% invested іn gоld. Sоmе rесоmmеnd uр tо 20%

Thеrе аrе mаnу rеаѕоnѕ whу оnе ѕhоuld buу gold аnd ѕіlvеr. Fоr thе average person, investing іn thеѕе рrесіоuѕ metals іѕ fоr іnѕurаnсе аnd peace оf mіnd … nоt a ԛuісk trаdе. It іѕ a hеdgе аgаіnѕt inflation, currency dеvаluаtіоn, аnd thе еvеr-сhаngіng unсеrtаіntу аnd unрrеdісtаbіlіtу оf thе global fіnаnсіаl climate. Buy gold or silver with Bitcoin via Bullion79.com online now.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Frank Holmes: Negative Real Interest Rates to Send Gold Soaring

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/frank-holmes-negative-real-interest-rates-to-send-gold-soaring/

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome in Frank Holmes, CEO and chief investment officer at US Global Investors. Mr. Holmes has received various honors over the years, including being named America’s Best Fund Manager by the Mining Journal. He’s also the co-author of the book The Goldwatcher: Demystifying Gold Investing, and is a regular guest on CNBC, Bloomberg, Fox Business, and also right here on the Money Metals podcast.

Frank, welcome back and thanks for joining us again today. How are you?

Frank Holmes: I’m great. And it’s wonderful to be back and see the gold markets have a new life and vibrancy to it.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, certainly a lot going on since we spoke to you back in the spring, and we’ll get into all of that. First off though, Frank, you recently wrote about the bond markets. In that article you noted that a quarter of all bonds traded worldwide have a negative yield. That’s simply extraordinary. In one out of four cases, a bond purchaser will pay the borrower to hold onto their capital. We’re having a hard time reconciling sentiment in the U.S., which is that the economy is strong and the future is bright, with what the global bond market seems to be saying. Investors who are ready to pay a borrower to hold their money probably aren’t doing it because they see opportunities for growth elsewhere. What do you make of this situation, and has this ever even happened before?

Frank Holmes: No, it’s unprecedented. And there’s even a whole philosophy being pushed by socialists of just having monetary policy so they can have the greatest socialist regulations galore, and they’ll just keep the economy going by managing the money. And eventually that just falls apart, that concept. But that’s full throttle. I think the new book that came out on economic, the new way of managing the economy, is applying this thought process. But I remember Ian McAfee years ago showed that in each time to move the Dow, move the economy, it took more and more debt. And eventually that debt starts to create an asset inflation. So, if you look at asset inflation, it’s quite substantial with this cheap debt.

But I think the bigger part is it’s the EU. And I write about these macro forces and I try to say simplify things as best you can. And when we look at China versus America, well, China and America are very significant because they’re 40% of global trade. So, when you have a punch out between these two countries, it’s very significant to the global economy. And if you have a problem between China and India, they’re 40% of the consumers of the world. When you look at that fact, being 40% of the world’s consumption, they have a high correlation to GDP per capita rising and consuming many different types of food products and clothes and, in particular, gold. And that’s what drives a big component of that “love trade.”

And then we have the sort of geopolitical, economic political philosophy that’s been growing out of the past 20 years out of years. And the creation of the EU and the euro has just led to a real significant growth in socialism and the policies and they control all this narrative. And you’re getting a backlash to it by different politicians, particularly in America. You see Trump as part of… he wants to drain the swamp is one of his expressions, but there’s been a pushback, and Brexit’s part of that pushback. Modi did some things that were incredible. And same thing in China, went after all the families that were stealing money and put them all in jail, had a big crackdown on illegal casinos, etc. So there’s something of a change taking place at very big macro forces.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, certainly something to keep an eye on. Speaking of yields, the Fed has just moved to lower interest rates, and now we have to start speculating about what their next move might be. And I’d like to get your assessment. What do you think? Is this move the start of a new cycle of rate reductions? Or will officials pause here for a while and see what happens?

Frank Holmes: I don’t know I’m set it in it, but I will share with you and the math, and I wrote about this going back to 1971, that anytime rates were dropped during an expansionary part of the economy, it was 100% probability the market’s up six to nine months out. So, we still have an expanding economy here, and there’s a concern it’s going to roll over quickly and we’re trying to stop that. I also think there’s the geopolitical on this with what the Europeans are trying to do, they’re all going to… the socialist mindset is go to zero interest rates and negative… real interest rates, negative. You go buy a 10-year government bond and they’re going to pay you one basis point and inflation is running at one and a half percent. You’re losing money over 10 years. And so that means that the euro’s going to go lower and they’re using that, so that’s the art of manipulation. So, the only way to compete against that, to help the U.S. economy keep it going, is drop the taxes for corporations to be competitive with Europe and Asia, now it’s got to make sure the currency doesn’t become too overpriced because it will affect the exports, they’re going to drop rates here.

So, I’m a big believer it’s going to happen. And if we go back to 2002, 2006, we had a great bull market in gold stocks, and the big reason for that is not only was gold going up, but the stock market was going up. And to really get big alpha in gold stocks, you need to have a combination of both.

Mike Gleason: Of course we want to get more of your thoughts on precious metals markets. We spoke last in April. Since then, we’ve seen the metals perk up quite a bit. Silver has gained about 10% and gold is up not quite 11%. So far, the move has been pretty under the radar. There isn’t a lot of gold coverage, say, on CNBC for example. And we’re seeing a decent number of clients who look at these higher prices as an opportunity to sell, not the beginning of a new trend higher necessarily. Given the number of false starts and the length of the bear market cycle we’ve been mired in, we understand skepticism. But what do you make of the recent move in metals? And might gold and silver investors expect between now and year-end?

Frank Holmes: Well, the old expression follow the trendlines not the headlines. And the trendline is very positive and constructive. And coming back onto this sort of global negative real interest rates, this is very bullish for gold. And we’re seeing this show up in more and more central banks increasing their exposure to gold, a lot of rookies coming in. And if you look at Europe, it’s Eastern European countries which are more conservative, Poland and Hungary, etc., they have been buying gold. And we’re seeing the Russians continue to buy their gold, and we’re seeing China continue to buy gold. So, I think that these negative real interest rates, it’s a very bullish scenario for gold. And last time we had gold hit $1,900, what people don’t realize is that the 10-year U.S. government bond was minus 300 basis points. That was the yield. Inflation was spiked that high. And real interest rates in the U.S. went positive. That is, what was the government paying on the 10-year money minus the CPI numbers are positive or negative is the real interest rate model. And then it went to plus 200 basis points. Well, gold fell to around $1,000, and now it’s been rebounding back as rates are going negative again.

So, that’s what they call the “fear trade.” And when the U.S. dollar, which is the biggest economy in the world, all of a sudden starts going in that direction, negative interest rates while the rest of the world is, it propels gold and gold can easily go back to $1,900. And it just takes a while, and you’re right, you’re absolutely right, that a lot of times the headlines are on other news, it’s not really bullish on gold. And there’s a natural propensity for New York to be anti-gold, even when you have great hedge funds coming out and owners of these players coming out and saying they’ve increased their exposure to gold. Each month there’s some new hedge fund this year that’s a billionaire that’s increased their exposure to gold.

Mike Gleason: In our view metals are continuing to fight headwinds from the equity markets. Yes, both metals and equities are performing well here, but that’s been limited to, say, the last three months or so. In general, it has been hard for metals to get anything going when sentiment is for risk on. But perhaps we have that wrong here. Maybe over the past three months we’ve been seeing more positioning around the inflation trade, perhaps more people are going to bet on dollar weakness and we’ll see metals and stocks continue to move higher together. What do you expect as to the relationship between stocks and metals in the months ahead, Frank?

Frank Holmes: I mentioned earlier that whenever you have an expanding economy and you drop rates in the U.S., it is very bullish for stocks. And if you have negative real interest rates, it’s very bullish for gold. So, having an expanding economy is bullish for stocks and negative rates are bullish for gold and silver, guess what? Gold and silver stocks are going to rip. And they’ve done that. Our gold equity ETF is up 40% year to date, and it’s crushed every other active gold fund manager, and it’s also crushed the other ETFs that are out there.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, that’s obviously been a great thing over the last few years. You follow the mining industry very closely. I know that’s kind of what’s spurred you on to launch the GOAU Fund. Talk about the miners in general and then also more about GOAU.

Frank Holmes: Well, I think on the miners end is it’s very hard for them, I think they’re going to have to do more acquisitions. Globally, there’s been very few mega discoveries. That’s become a real challenge. And the grades are falling for copper and gold and silver. I think that we have actually peak gold. Outside of recycling of gold, you can’t recycle oil, but you can recycle gold. I think that it’s pretty well peaked. And any pickup in huge demand globally, you can see the imbalance of supply and demand. There are points that are really important for investors to look at. And you’re seeing it percolate now in speculation because there’s lots of junior stocks that are up about 200% with getting any drill hole results. A year ago this wouldn’t happen. So, sentiment on speculative money is now looking at good results and plowing in, taking on speculative capital and going into them.

I think one of the smartest guys out there is Eric Sprott. He basically built, in a bear market, Kirkland Lake, retires as chairman and cashes out, he made $800 million. And now he’s peeling off that stock and he’s becoming one of the biggest single investors in mining districts and buying companies. And he’s already spent, I think in the past couple months, $140 million in exploration in brownfield developments. He’s made an investment in a company called Goldspot that recently went public, which I became the chairman, and we both have a big position in this company. And what are they doing? They’re doing AI and machine learning on exploration data to try to de-risk exploration so they can find these projects better. And I think that that’s going to be like fracking is for oil and some of the junior exploration companies that get royalties on that business. And as you know, I love royalty companies. Our GOAU is 30% (made up of) royalty companies because it’s a superior business model.

Now, when we look at a lot of the gold stocks that are in the GDXJ, they’ve raised capital or they’ve done mergers, and it’s really been diluted for investors. And the world today has changed dramatically, that 70% of all buying and selling is quant funds, and quant funds focus on the value per share, not the total gross value. So, we’ve had these stupid mergers go through or acquisitions you could call them, and they say, “Oh, our top line has grown dramatically,” but on a per share basis, it’s declined. Their reserves in cash flow have declined. Those stocks get put into a penalty box and money won’t go into them. So, what we did is we created an ETF that only bought 25 of those names where those stocks met these five key factors, and each quarter we recalibrate and rebalance them, and we basically call high-grading, those stocks are either the cheapest on a relative basis, on reserves per share, production per share, cash flow and revenue per share. And then we look at those companies that have momentum, where the last quarter’s above the four quarters in revenue, the last quarter of cash flow’s above four quarters, and you buy those basket of stocks. And historically, they outperform just a market cap-based index like the GDX or GDXJ.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, I love what you’re doing there with that, and especially the weighting that you have on the royalty companies. I love those as well, especially just look what they’ve done over the last few years when it was a bear market. The royalty companies, it’s just a superior business model it seems.

Well, as we wrap up here, Frank, any concern over maybe the fact that gold has maybe petered out a little bit or not busted higher once it crossed through $1,400? Some were expecting that it would just rise to $1,500 and be off to the races, but it hasn’t necessarily happened. How do you view that?

Frank Holmes: In my crypto-space business, which I launched the industrial scale crypto mining company called HIVE Blockchain, I really noticed for the first time the assault on Bitcoin that takes place at the Bank of International Settlements, which would rather have worthless central banks from Venezuela clearing through them, and promoting fiat money, than they would Bitcoin. And they’re so vicious the way they’ve articulated this story that I started digging deeper and found out that they’re also very much anti-gold, but they’re not as vocal about it. And it involves so often with the gold swaps. So, I think there’s suppression. And I know it’s now come out with some cases, they’re showing that in court and there’s been some judgments against it, of spoofing the market. There’s a new event that took place today on Bank of Nova Scotia, a former trader that was spoofing the gold market got charged. Morgan Stanley’s trader got charged for spoofing the market, found guilty.

So, I think that one reason why it’s not going to take off radically and quickly, but it’s going to have that nice slow climb, is because people like the Bank of International Settlements, which is the central bank of central bankers, basically want to have this rollover of this cheap paper, and almost play, “Hey, there’s no problem here because we can keep rolling over and if gold takes off, and that country’s currency, then all of a sudden it makes that ability to roll over paper money more difficult.

Mike Gleason: No problem. Yeah, very well put. It’s obviously the anti-paper money, anti-fiat money, and of course that’s why the powers that be in the central banks don’t want to see gold doing well. But there’s only so much they can do to really rein it in and hold it down.

Frank Holmes: So, I keep recommending with that silver, silver, silver. If you tell everyone and they buy silver coins and give them to your children and their grandchildren, give them to your employees for the most valuable employee of the month or the year, give away those silver coins, because they never get rid of them, they hold onto them, and eventually that silver will go back to $50.

Mike Gleason: I agree. Lots of value there in silver when you look at the ratio compared to gold.

Well, we’ll leave it there. Thanks, Frank. Look forward to catching up with you in a few months as we look at this all unfold. And then as always, please fill our listeners in on your firm, US Global Investors, and then also mention how they can find the great Frank Talk Blog that we all enjoy so much.

Frank Holmes: You’re so kind. Thank you very much for your generous recommendations. It’s simple, it’s USfunds.com. And you subscribe to the Investor Alert and the Frank Talk blog, it’s my travels around the world, meeting interesting people. And then every week we have a swat approach of the capital markets of different asset classes. So, I highly recommend it. It grows every week, it’s free, and we have I think 50,000 readers in 180 countries.

Mike Gleason: Well, great stuff. Thanks again. I hope you enjoy the rest of your summer, Frank. And we’ll catch up very soon. Take care.

Frank Holmes: Happy investing.

Mike Gleason: Well that will do for this week, thanks again to Frank Holmes CEO of US Global Investors and manager of the GoAU Gold Fund. For more information the site is USfunds.com. Be sure to check out the previously mentioned Frank Talk blog for some great commentaries on gold and other related topics. Again, you can find all of that at USfunds.com.

 

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

 

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Gordon Chang: Gold to Benefit as Chinese Economy Hits the Wall

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/economy/gordon-chang-gold-to-benefit-as-chinese-economy-hits-the-wall/

“No China Trade Deal Until 2020, Maybe 2021… Maybe Never”

 

 

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome back Gordon Chang, author, television pundit and columnist. Gordon is a frequent guest on Fox News, CNBC and CNN among others, and is one of the foremost experts on Asian economics and geopolitics, having written books on the subject, and it’s great to have them back on with us.

Gordon, it’s a real honor to have you on again and thanks so much for the time today. I know you’re a man in high demand these days given your expertise on Asia and China in particular and I really appreciate you coming on to talk to us. How are you?

Gordon Chang: I’m fine, and it’s a real honor for me to be on your podcast, so thank you very much, Mike.

Mike Gleason: Well, trade tensions with China have been one of the big stories in the financial press for the past year and a half. We’ve seen U.S. equity markets gyrate up and down. One day traders are euphoric on rumors that a deal with China will soon be reached. The next day, they’re depressed over news of escalating tariffs and some other negative developments. Most recently, we saw a big rally in the stock market on the announcement that some tariffs will be delayed by a few months, although with the further inversion of the yield curve here today, the day we’re talking, Wednesday, the stock market is giving pretty much all of that back. But that aside, I’d like to start by getting your assessment of the prospects for a trade deal here, Gordon. Do you think we’re going to see these tensions resolved in the next few months?

Gordon Chang: Certainly not. I don’t see a comprehensive trade deal until 2020, maybe 2021, maybe never. Problem is Xi Jinping, the Chinese ruler, doesn’t necessarily want a deal. He owns this trade war, quote-unquote, and if he makes significant compromises, he’s going to accept the political responsibility for that. You’ve got to remember that accumulating great power is of course an advantage, but it means he also accumulated great accountability. He can’t blame other people. So I think that the Chinese political system right now is pretty much frozen, and that means we’re not going to see a comprehensive deal. We’re probably not even going to see an interim arrangement, either.

Mike Gleason: President Trump has been confident that the U.S. has the upper hand in trade negotiations. He believes China needs the U.S. more than we need them. Frankly, we don’t know if the president’s assessment factors in America’s largest export to China, that being U.S. dollars. We export an awful lot of inflation to China and might be ignoring the vast quantities of U.S. treasury debt they hold. So, it appears as though China does have some leverage here. There is also some political leverage. They certainly know how eager the president is to avoid a recession between now and the 2020 election. On the other hand, it would be hard to overestimate how important exports to the U.S. are to the Chinese economy. What are your thoughts about who is holding the stronger hand here? All right, so who has the upper hand?

Gordon Chang: The United States has the upper hand. You look at all the metrics, and they point in our direction. So first of all, we’ve got the larger economy. Last year, we produced $20.5 trillion of gross domestic product. China claimed $13.82 trillion, but that number is probably exaggerated. Also, we don’t have a trade dependent economy. Everyone wants the U.S. market, and indeed, China is dependent on us. They’re the trade surplus country. And we know from history that it’s the trade surplus countries that get hurt in trade wars, and China is extraordinarily dependent on us.

Last year, China’s merchandise trade surplus with the U.S. accounted for 119.3% of their overall merchandise surplus. That gives us enormous leverage over Beijing. And by the way, Mike, we’ve got a robust economy. We grew 2.1% in the last quarter. China, who knows what they grew, but probably half of what we did at best. And they could have even been contracting the numbers from China, especially the last couple months. The underlying indicators look particularly gruesome. So overall metrics, we’ve got them.

The only issue is political will, and people think that Xi Jinping, the Chinese ruler, has got more of it than we do. President Trump is doing a pretty good imitation of someone who thinks he’s got political will. So, I think for the moment, we can say that the U.S. is going to be safe. There’s going to be a lot of squawking, but Trump doesn’t seem to care too much, and long term, we’re just in the position where we can push the Chinese around. All we have to do is realize that we can do it.

Mike Gleason: Certainly Trump has built up a lot of his credentials as a successful businessman, as a good negotiator, so obviously we do have to keep that in mind. Do you envision China continuing to devalue their currency or are starting to dump dollars to hurt the U.S. bond market? Do you see them pulling something like that or will they just talk about that and use that as a threat, as a negotiation tactic, but won’t actually follow through… what are your thoughts there?

Gordon Chang: I’m not particularly worried about China dumping U.S. treasury obligations to hurt us because we got to, first of all, remember they’ve only got, what, $2 trillion at most in a very big and liquid market, but also, just think about the way the dynamics of the markets work. 100% of our obligations are denominated in dollars. So, the Chinese are going to get dollars and then they’ve got to put them into other currencies in order to hurt us, euros, pounds, yen, whatever, which means that Brussels, London, and Tokyo have got to go out in the global markets to bring their currencies back down in value because they’re going to soar when the Chinese buy them. So, these central banks have got to rebalance their currencies and the only way they can do that is to buy dollars. The Chinese have been talking about the nuclear options since the middle of 2008 but they never do it. And the reason they never do it is because they know it won’t work.

Mike Gleason: Getting back to the Chinese economy, over the years, it has been really hard for U.S. investors to get an accurate picture of what is really happening. We’ve all heard about the massive economic growth there, but then there are conflicting stories. We hear that growth is artificial. Many ghost cities have been built, and China’s economy is a massive bubble which could pop any time. You’ve been one of the strongest voices warning of troubles ahead over there. Recently, you appeared on Fox News and noted the Chinese are doing, “Some things which smell desperate.” Can you share with our listeners what you’re seeing there?

Gordon Chang: Yeah, if you look at, for instance, the numbers from June and July, they show imports are consistently down month after month and that shows weak demand. Car sales, which are bellwether, they were off for 13 straight months in July. You’re starting to see, for instance, urban unemployment increase, and some of these numbers which are supposed to be strong aren’t.

So, for instance, the purchasing managers indices for the manufacturing sector had been flashing negative, both the official one and the unofficial one. Industrial output in July was very low, the lowest in about 17 years or so, something like that. So, we’re seeing an economy right now that is in trouble. You go back, for instance, to December of last year, you had a professor at Brandman University in Beijing. He created a sensation across China when he said, “Look, the economy in 2018 is going to grow no more than 1.67%. It may even contract.”

Now, Beijing reported 6.6% for the year, but they’re not acting as if they’ve got an economy growing that fast. And by the way, even if they were growing at 6.6%, they’re creating an amount of debt which is about five and a half times more than they’re producing nominal GDP. They can do that for a little while because they control borrowers, lenders, courts, everything. But they can’t do that for very much longer. So, I think that they realize they’re in trouble right now and they just don’t know how to get out of it. When their default position is to just sort of spend more government money, but with the debt accumulating the way it is, I don’t think that they can do that for too much longer.

Mike Gleason: We’ve recently seen demand rising for gold and silver, including physical bullion. There are a number of reasons, some good price performances helping, but some of the demand is coming from investors who are increasingly skeptical about the U.S. equity markets, the dollar and even bond prices. As we’ve discussed, the trade dispute with China is one of the wildcards. Another is the risk that the Chinese economy will falter. Back in the summer of 2015 when the Chinese market was plummeting, it was a very rough time for stock markets all over the world. So, we have some recent history to go on there as to how important the Chinese economy can be to the rest of the globe. So, let’s about that one. What do you think it will mean for the U.S. if the bubble in China finally does pop, Gordon?

Gordon Chang: I think people are going to be taken by surprise. I don’t think they should, but they will be because markets do believe that China is growing somewhere close to the reported numbers. But we’re starting to see a rush to safe havens, and especially the 10-year Treasury. People want it, and that’s a real sign that there are problems in the global economy. And of course, China is going to exacerbate that. So, I think long-term, I would imagine that there’s going to be a flight to safe haven and when the Chinese economy does hit the wall, it’s going to be very good to be in 10-year Treasuries, in gold and other safe haven assets.

Mike Gleason: Well, as we begin to close here, Gordon, any final comments that you want to leave us with today? And I didn’t ask you much about North Korea, so maybe give us your thoughts on the developments there and other geopolitical theater that you’re going to be watching over in Asia in the coming weeks and months that investors might want to be thinking about and keeping an eye on.

Gordon Chang: I think the most important thing in terms of geopolitical developments in Asia to watch in terms of effect on financial markets is going to be the situation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is irreplaceable as a city, but we’re seeing a hardening of attitudes on both sides. You’ve got not only the pro-democracy kids, but you’ve got a big portion of the Hong Kong population, at least two thirds, maybe three quarters, that are supporting the kids because they believe that this is the last stand for autonomy. And because of that hardening of attitudes, I think you’re going to see both sides take positions that probably are going to end up shaking not only the Hong Kong markets, but global markets as well. North Korea, at least for the moment, is a side show. Hong Kong is where we really need to look to get our clues to where things are going.

Mike Gleason: Obviously, a lot of us have seen what happened there this week just on our TV sets about the riots in Hong Kong. Just lastly, what’s your take on that and do you think we’re going to see more of that sort of thing as the unrest grows?

Gordon Chang: Normally, you would think that demonstrations would just sort of lose their vigor and they sort of melt away, which is what happened in 2014 with the occupy protests. But these protests have been actually going on since April. We’re now in our 11th straight week, and they show no sign of stopping. And it’s because I think people believe that this is the last stand. So, there’s going to be difficulties ahead. I don’t think that the Beijing is going to deploy the People’s Armed Police or the People’s Liberation Army into Hong Kong at least until after October 1st, which is the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic, but sometime after that, I’d be very worried that China is going to do exactly that.

And by the way, Mike, we have had video evidence suggesting that mainland police officers or mainland army soldiers are actually on the Hong Kong streets right now dressed in Hong Kong police uniforms. So, for instance, from about a week ago, there’s this video of a Hong Kong riot policemen, who’s obviously from Hong Kong cause he’s speaking colloquial Cantonese, but then he turns to other riot policemen near him and starts speaking to them in Mandarin, which wouldn’t happen if those other guys were from Hong Kong, and indeed, he addresses them as comrade. So, there’s suggestion, which I think is pretty solid, that China’s already deployed. And so this is a situation which is going to get extremely emotional and it’s going to last a long time.

Mike Gleason: Very interesting development. Good catch there. That’s going to be something to keep an eye on, and yeah, maybe we’re witnessing the last stand there. As you mentioned, this could be quite interesting.

Well, Gordon, it’s been another fascinating conversation and we can’t thank you enough for sharing with us your incredibly studied view on the state of things in China and in Asia. We’re very fortunate to have you fill us in and give us your perspective given what’s going on of late and your incredible expertise in that area. And we hope to check back with you again in the future as we learn more about how this will play out and get your comments again. But in the meantime, take care and enjoy the rest of your summer. Thanks, Gordon.

Gordon Chang: Thank you very much, Mike.

Mike Gleason: Well, that will do it for this week. Thanks again to Gordon Chang. You can follow him on Twitter @GordonGChang or check out his book The Coming Collapse of China.

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

 

Friday, August 16, 2019

It’s Time to Get Serious about Silver

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/its-time-to-get-serious-about-silver/

The World Silver Survey 2019 Review, the institute’s annual World Silver Survey said that global silver demand hit a three-year high in 2018, surpassing more than one billion ounces, an increase of 4% from 2017.

At the same time, global silver mine production fell for the third straight year, dropping 2% in 2018 to 855.7 million ounces.

The top 10 silver producing countries are: Peru, Bolivia, Australia, Argentina, Mexico, Chile, Poland, China, Russia and Guatemala.

And get this… in every one of these countries, silver production has been falling for the last 4 consecutive years!

  • Supply from scrap sources is at a 20-year low.
  • Silver fabrication (manufacturing) demand is just below record levels.
  • Silver demand for solar panels has risen for six consecutive years – and is expected to set a new record in 2019

In comparison to the roughly 6 billion ounces of gold mined over history, roughly 54 billion ounces of silver are estimated to have been mined over time. In direct contrast to gold, however, roughly half of the mined silver (27.2 billion ounces) is estimated to have been consumed, destroyed or discarded. (Incrementum AG)

Subtracting from the remaining mined-total roughly 24 billion ounces of silver estimated to exist in the form of jewelry, silverware, statues and decorative objects, this leaves only 2.8 billion ounces in the existing, investable above-ground stock of silver, valued at only $46.2 billion.

Therefore, the investable stock of silver measures less than 2% of the (size of the) investable stock of gold. It is easy to appreciate why silver performance during precious metal advances can prove comparatively explosive! [emphasis added] (Maria Smirnova, Sprott Asset Management.)

Silver consumption by China (and India) shows no signs of abating.

The movement of gold from West to East (with over 60% transiting through Swiss refineries as it is turned into the most-in-demand form, .9999 fine) is like a virtual golden river.

While demand is picking up in some European countries, North America appears to be asleep, with many people actually selling their gold and silver into the most recent upside breakout. How much sense does that make?

Eight years of declining prices have caused many investors to develop a case of “continuation bias.”

They understandably assume that this downward trend – which at its low point had shaved off fully 60% of silver’s 2011 price point highs – will continue.

But…we emphatically believe they are incorrect!

About the evolving situation, David Morgan at The Morgan Report says the following:

“Silver will shine, then soar, and finally skyrocket, while stupefying the masses! Remember, only two-tenths of a percent of the world’s wealth is actually in silver. If that were to become just a measly one percent, it would require a 50-fold increase. So when all other assets are failing miserably do you really think that only one percent of the world’s population would want to own this timeless monetary metal?

Charts courtesy Graceland Updates

The above gold and silver charts have formed the most unusual technical patterns I have ever run across.

The gold chart shows an upward-sloping flag pattern, which is usually bearish – yet prices broke to the upside and then began forming another bull flag.

Silver is even more interesting.

Over the last few weeks prices have formed three stair-stepping bull flags. Whether this is a precursor to higher prices right now or we see a “correction” that contradicts them, it tells me that this is no ordinary rally. Not just a few months of upside action and then giving it all back like in 2016. Something much more significant is going on…

I fully believe that what we’re seeing in gold, silver and the mining shares is the beginning of what may evolve into the greatest metals’ bull market in which you and I have ever participated.

In the early 2000’s, I stated my belief that, before the public-mania phase had been completed a number of years hence, we would see silver prices at between $175 and $250 the ounce.

This may sound hard to believe.

However, we now have a gold metric figure to which this kind of prediction can be attached. A number of analysts have stated their belief that gold will reach as high as $40,000 or more an ounce.

Anything is possible, but I tend to be quite a bit more conservative. Using Jim Rickards projection of $10,000 an ounce – who I believe was the first one to state it, I then suggest a gold/silver ratio which might help define several price points under such a scenario.

Just a few weeks ago, the gold/silver ratio was 94:1, At this writing it’s still in the upper 80’s.

In 1980, the ratio got down to about 15:1. But I am going to be much more “conservative.” I suggest three ratio points that, assuming $10,000 gold, could helps us assign a silver price expectation when these two metals start topping out.

  • At 60:1, silver would trade at about $165 the ounce.
  • At 50:1, silver would trade at about $200 the ounce.
  • At 40:1, silver would trade at about $250 the ounce.
  • Below that – whip out your calculator and have some fun!

If the metals get anywhere near these levels, I will be implementing the plan David Morgan and I discuss in great detail in our book, Second Chance: How to Make – and Keep – Big Money from the Coming Gold and Silver Shock-Wave.

A lot of books talk about how to make a lot of money from such a big move, but our text may be the only one devoting serious thought – and devising a method according with, not against human nature – to a plan for how you should be able to actually hold onto most of it!

If our thinking resonates with you even a little bit, you owe it to yourself (and your family?) to get to work on a plan that makes sense for your situation and temperament and then execute it.

Start laying in some physical gold and silver. There is compelling evidence that as the price reaches about $26, a major resistance point from years’ past, “the public” – your friends and neighbors – will finally decide to join the crowd.

With such a relatively small market you can be certain, assuming availability, both the price and the premiums will be much higher than they are today. So what’s the point of waiting?

 

David Smith is Senior Analyst for TheMorganReport.com and a regular contributor to MoneyMetals.com. For the past 15 years, he has investigated precious metals’ mines and exploration sites in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Bolivia, China, Canada, and the U.S. He shares his resource sector findings with readers, the media, and North American investment conference attendees.

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

Fool’s Silver: Why Most “Silver Miners” Don’t Live Up to Their Name

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/fools-silver-why-most-silver-miners-dont-live-up-to-their-name/

If you buy shares in a silver mining company, you will have to assume additional market risks compared to ownership of silver bullion. You may wish to do so in order to potentially gain leveraged exposure to silver prices.

What you may not realize, however, is that most of the publicly traded “silver” stocks out there are primarily in the business of mining other metals – sometimes gold, often copper, zinc, lead, and other base metals.

Consider Pan American Silver (NYSE:PAAS), a $3.6 billion company that makes up the largest weighting (13.5%) in the Global X Silver Miners ETF (NYSE:SIL).

While Pan American is indeed a producer of silver, its business comes mainly from other metals. According to BMO estimates, only 33% of Pan American Silver’s revenue in 2019 will come from silver production.

Rare is the silver miner that actually derives most of its revenue from silver mining. There are both geological and philosophical reasons behind the paucity of pure silver producers.

Since silver deposits tend to accumulate around other metals, valuable byproducts will be extracted during the mining process. Most silver is produced as a byproduct of mining for base metals, so primary silver mines are few and far between.

Mining company CEOs generally prefer to diversify their revenue streams beyond a single metal to manage risk and become more appealing to Wall Street analysts, bankers, and institutional investors.

Gold and silver bugs who expect mining industry executives to share their bullishness about prices or their commitment to sound money principles will be sorely disappointed. Very few of them are allies to the broader precious metals community.

These companies also tend to be run by geologists, engineers, and accountants who, by their nature, often don’t see the big picture.

A recent and obnoxious example of this problem is Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL), the Idaho-based company that repeatedly refused to support legislative efforts in its home state that nearly ended income taxation on gold and silver.

Add Hecla management’s refusal to reinforce the public policy importance of its own products (to the very state in which it operates) to the reasons this miner’s stock price has gone nowhere but down in recent years, including during silver’s recent rally.

One exception is First Majestic CEO Keith Neumeyer. He is enthusiastic about silver and tuned in to the values and concerns of physical bullion holders. First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) is the purest major producer, with 62% of its revenue attributable to its namesake metal.

Of course, you will never find a purer silver play than actual .999 pure silver bullion products.

The further your silver-related investments get from the underlying metal, the more they will be driven by other factors you may not necessarily understand or believe in.

When silver starts becoming a hot commodity again, Wall Street will surely supply a bevy of new “silver” equities and exchange-traded derivative products – most of which will serve to divert casual investors away from investing in silver itself.

Right now one of the easiest – and least efficient – ways for the public to invest in the silver industry is through SIL.

This “Silver Miners” ETF is top heavy with majors that mine mostly other metals. It is also populated with royalty/streaming/exploration companies that do little to no mining. SIL carries an annual expense ratio of 0.65%, which is quite high compared to other passively managed funds.

If your aim is to invest in silver producers, you’re better off focusing on particular companies that deliver the goods. If you lack the time or know-how to pick quality mining stocks, you won’t go wrong by simply owning what they produce via physical bullion.

 

Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC, and his writings have appeared in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, Washington Times, and National Review.

Monday, August 12, 2019

David Morgan: “This is the real move in gold and silver… it’s going to be multiyear.”

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/david-morgan-this-is-the-real-move-in-gold-and-silver-its-going-to-be-multiyear/

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome back our good friend David Morgan of The Morgan Report. David, it’s always good to have you on and appreciate you joining us today. How are you, sir?

David Morgan: Mike, I’m doing all right and it’s good to be with you.

Mike Gleason: Well, David, I know we don’t have a whole lot of time today, but I’m really glad we’re able to speak to you this week because we’re finally seeing some real fireworks here in the metals lately. And I wanted to get your comments.

I should mention that we’re talking here on Thursday morning and we’ve got gold hovering around $1,500 and silver right at about $17. They both popped above those respective key levels yesterday, Wednesday. So first off, what do you make of this move, David? What’s driving it? And the bigger question, will it be sustained?

David Morgan: Well, what’s driving it is something that no one’s really, really talking about. This is my opinion. Of course, you’re asking for my opinion. A lot is the financial press, “Well, It’s all about this trade war with China and the trade war is getting worse. And there’s going to be more sanctions coming in,” and on and on and on. And that may have something to do with it.

But first of all, the underlying fundamental is financial uncertainty. That’s number one. But beyond that, it’s really something going on in the physical market that no one’s really writing about and I don’t know enough about the state other than it’s got to be part of it. The reason I say that is that the paper paradigm is very clear on how the markets move in the futures markets with trading this paper back and forth for contracts to buy and sell silver. And all they really do is set the paper price.

And of course the metals price goes along with that. I’m not trying to discount that very much. What I’m trying to state is that the paper markets dominate the price over and over again. And every now and again you’ll get in a situation like this where something’s going on, where something needs to be fulfilled and accomplished, and it hasn’t been settled out yet.

So for an example, let’s say there’s some bank that’s demanding a physical settlement in gold and they haven’t received it yet. Once that’s accomplished, you may, and most likely, see the market cool off and go more into some type of trading range where you’re more apt to be able to look at the paper trades, more of what we call levels that we’re used to seeing.

So, I think there’s something out there. Whether that’s occurring with silver or not, I doubt it, right now based on the fact that silver has been lagging gold so much. And there’s a couple of gaps in the charts that will probably be filled, one, you haven’t missed this move at all. If you bought yesterday at maybe the high, I don’t know yet, and it goes down and let’s say silver makes it all the way back down into the, I don’t know, $15.50 range or something, you haven’t missed much. Yeah, you wouldn’t want to buy and see a loss right away. But what I’m trying to state is this, I’m convinced, is the real move. It’s going to be multi-year. And silver and gold, at the end of three, four years from now are going to be substantially higher than they are today.

Mike Gleason: Certainly strong comments. You’re always take a very level-headed approach and have not been just pumping sunshine over these last several years every time we get a rally. So, that’s definitely something that we should all take note of.

Now, silver, you mentioned this, silver does seem to be underperforming a little bit vis-a-vis gold. And now we’ve seen the gold-silver ratio come down from, I think I saw it 93 to one, maybe about there, within the last few months. It’s about 88 to one right now. So, silver has gained somewhat but maybe not quite like you would expect given a big bull move and given that silver should vastly outperform gold in a bull market. So is this seeming lack of out performance from silver a cause for concern?

David Morgan: Somewhat still it is. First of all, I like to see, I mean 80 to 1 at a minimum. And even there that’s an extreme.

When I started the previous website – my website, I think everyone knows is TheMorganReport.com – I rebranded that for years now because I want everyone to be aware that I cover all the resource sector, lithium, rare-earths, et cetera, and not just silver.

But back in the older days with Silver-Investor.com, when I started that website, the ratio was 80 to one, and that was an extreme. And if you would have asked me, even, I don’t know, three years ago, a couple years ago, “Will you see the gold-silver ratio above 80 to one?” I would’ve said, “No. I really, really doubt it” and I’m wrong. It’s got to about 93, 4, 5, somewhere in that range.

So, to really be convinced that, and first of all, I’m convinced that we’re in a new bull market, to be convinced that things are, let’s say, going to show both metals really outperform many other sectors, the equity markets, the bond market, the real estate market, everything else, and take the dominating lead as this currency crisis continues, I want to see silver below a 70-to-one ratio. That would be ultimate confirmation for me, Mike that okay, we’re well on our way, and we’re not. We’re at 88.

Silver has some work to do. Silver is, in my view, much more difficult to analyze than gold, but it can make these moves rather drastically and quickly as gold is doing. Of course, silver’s done pretty good job here of late picking up some momentum and moving from the doldrums into the 17, which is still dirt cheap.

I mean, if you take an AISC, all-in sustaining cost, for some of the major silver producers, they’ll tell you they’re at $15 but they don’t tell you is what their taxes are. So if you add those in, a lot of them are right at basically where we’re at, in other words $17. They’re just break even.

And for any company, what they’re making dresses or corn chips or cola, you want as wide a margin as you can get commensurate with what the market’s willing to pay for your product. And in the case of silver, these companies are still struggling at these levels. So, silver’s got a long ways to go, as does gold, for the margins to be large enough for these companies to breathe easy and have a viable business and be able to have a cashflow that allows them to go out and explore further or retain assets or whatever. So, I see a lot of upside but I’m also anxious for silver to kind of show its wings and fly, and that type of thing.

Mike Gleason: Gold has risen to levels last seen in 2013 when it broke down. But silver obviously is nowhere near those levels, which was say the mid-20s at about that point. What is it going to take for silver to get back above that say into the $20 plus range and what are some of the key resistance points you’re watching for silver between here and there and then beyond?

David Morgan: Okay. Well for, yeah, it does take more interest in the metals all together. Obviously there’s a lot of interests coming in, but it’s mostly institutional. It’s not your retail (investors) at this time. I talk to many dealers such as yourself, Mike. And what I found out was a little bit surprising. A lot of this trading is going through, as I said, institutions which means futures trading and ETFs and a lot of the retail investors are saying, you know what gold’s back to where I bought it, I bought it at this $1,450. It’s there, I’m selling it back. So a lot of the retail investors aren’t believing this rally is for real. And what they’re doing is basically getting their money back. Not all of them of course, but so there’s a lot of work to be done on the silver side. There is lots of areas of resistance on this.

Pulling up a chart as we’re speaking, Mike, because I anticipated this. So there’s huge resistance at $17, which is where we’re at right now as we speak. Will it get through that? Yes. Eventually it will. Will it instantly? I doubt it. I think it’ll come back and fill the gap. And I’m going to do an update for my paid members here, show them where a good entry point is. If they have stopped, if they want to get into this market or add to their positions, whatever. Normally I do that all through equities. I use the futures as a proxy for the overall market. Doesn’t mean you should do futures. In fact, a dissuade anybody from using the futures market. It’s just, that’s where the price is set. So it’s easier to analyze, and I can show them on the chart when silver gets to this level, that’s a good time to start buying your top tier or your favorite junior or whatever you’re going to do.

So, $17… $17 to $17.25 is a pretty big area of resistance. After that, it floats up to a really $19-20 pretty easily. So once we work through that level, Mike, you’ll probably see an acceleration of silver from, I’m going to say $17.50 up to $19.50 I expect it to go to that level fairly quickly. It won’t be like two trading days, but it may probably won’t take very long. Silver could surprise anybody, even me as far as how it reacts. It doesn’t seem to ever do what you expect it to do. But regardless it will outperform and we do need to see a higher level. Once again, over the $20 level, I think the psychology will change and people will say, “It’s silver, not so bad.” Now, they won’t touch at $15. I know you guys sell silver at all levels and every day and there’s always purchases.

But, mark my words, you check the volume and activity at your business. How many people are calling in and buying silver or when it gets silver when it gets over $20, what it’s doing now, and I’m sure you’ll be selling more at that level. People just love to buy the metals at a higher price. When I’m pounding the table saying “This is it.”

Because most people don’t want to put up with, the time, the patience that’s required, if you bought silver at $14 at the end of 2015. Watched it rally all the way up to $21. I was convinced at that time where the bull mark was back in tact. And in a way it is, I mean if you look at gold from that perspective, that’s where it bottomed and has had high or lows all the way up. Silver’s chart doesn’t look like that. Silver bottoms at the same time as gold, which is December, 2015. and it has not made high or lows all the way up. And we’ve basically stayed flat to about $15.75 and then it broke down from there and it got down as low as the 14s. So still higher than it was in December, 2015 but a messy chart, let’s say.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, there’s certainly some big, big levels above us and yeah, I agree. I think when we see silver, get that two handle again. I think that’s when a lot of people are going recognize that okay, it’s time to start moving and the smart people will do it before then.

Again, thanks David for fitting us in. I know we had a tight window here and it’s been great to have you on. But as we wrap up though, I want to give you a chance to fill our audience in on any of the other markets that you’re looking at here.

David Morgan: Sure. Always looking at the equity market and of course the bonds are the key and the currency markets – we looking at everything really. I think the stock market is showing some wear. It’s been a bull market for quite some time. It’s overvalued by any metric you want to use. I’m looking at that and see it get rolled over further. And then bond market of course is the key because this is the debt markets that everything depends on and how much faith there is in that is going to determine the future of the financial system. So, those are key currencies. As I’ve said many times you can see gold and the dollar go up. Dollar’s making new highs. Gold’s making a six year high. And I said “Watch.” And of course here we are. There’s a reason for that. So, I think that’s about it.

I just close out, I got this email. “I’m a young guy, I have a high conviction, precious metal is the best place to be in the next three to five years. I’m in need of guidance of how to build a long-term precious metals portfolio. I want to fund this as soon as possible. I know you’re not a financial adviser, but you offer services that will help me start a precious metal portfolio. I continue to monitor the market on an ongoing basis with your analysis, can you help me?” And that’s almost precisely what I do. So, I will get with this gentleman and kind of reaffirm what he’s already asking. Can you help me? Yeah, that’s what our business is. So anyway, if you want to learn more, just go TheMorganReport.com put in a first name and an email address, be happy to put you on our free list. And you can determine from there, if you want to go further.

Mike Gleason: There’s probably no better time to get in and get on board with services like The Morgan Report, and the great commentary that David and his team put out there. And, and just see what’s going happen and what they have to say about these markets as we could be entering this new bull phase. I mean, you heard David say it, he’s convinced we’re in a new bull market and this is going to be an exciting time and the time that precious metals investors have been waiting for, for a number of years. So definitely urge people to take advantage of that and go to TheMorganReport.com it’s truly great stuff. You have just heard what David was talking about. A great approach to all these markets and lots and lots of experience over the years. He’s seen everything.

Well good stuff David. Always appreciate it. Thanks so much. I hope you enjoy the rest of your summer and I can’t wait for our next conversation, take care.

David Morgan: Thanks so much Mike. It’s great to be back with you.

Mike Gleason: Well that will do it for this week. Thanks again to David Morgan, publisher of The Morgan Report. To follow David, just visit TheMorganReport.com you can follow him on Twitter, it’s @silverguru22. And if you haven’t already, grab a copy of the book titled Second Chance: How to Make and Keep Big Money During the Coming Gold and Silver Shock Wave, which is available at MoneyMetals.com and other places where books are sold. Be sure to check that out. And check out the TheMorganReport.com and start getting wonderful commentaries from David and his team on a regular basis.

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

Friday, August 9, 2019

Precious Metals Soar on Falling Yields, Currency Turmoil

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/precious-metals-soar-on-falling-yields-currency-turmoil/

What a wild week it’s been for investors.

The threat of global trade wars and currency wars sparked big swings across all major asset classes.  Bond yields dove toward historic lows.  Stocks plunged earlier in the week before rebounding sharply by Thursday.  And precious metals rode a huge safe-haven wave higher.

Gold prices eclipsed the $1,500 level on Wednesday for the first time in over six years. Meanwhile, silver pushed above $17 an ounce to record a one-year high. Both metals are up over 4% for the week.

The money metals are becoming increasingly attractive as President Donald Trump ramps up his battles against China abroad and the Federal Reserve at home.

On Monday, the Trump administration formally branded China a “currency manipulator.”  China’s central bank had moved to push the yuan lower against the U.S. dollar in apparent retaliation for new U.S. tariffs.  The yuan traded at its cheapest exchange rate versus the dollar in more than a decade.

Curiously, the U.S. Dollar Index also traded lower this week against the euro and yen.

Perhaps the Trump administration is engaging in some currency manipulation of its own through the Treasury Department’s Exchange Stabilization Fund and the International Monetary Fund.  Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin called on the IMF to help put brakes on countries that cheapen their currencies to gain trade advantages.

A former Treasury Secretary, Larry Summers, said that we may now be at the most dangerous moment since the last global financial crisis ended in 2009.  The circumstances are different today, but in some ways the risks are more extreme.

The entire world monetary order is at risk.  President Trump is now explicitly ditching the “strong dollar” posturing of previous presidents.  He wants a weaker dollar and hopes he can pressure the Federal Reserve into cooperating with bigger and more rapid interest rate cuts.

A shift toward a weak dollar policy could make foreign holders of U.S. assets nervous.  Close to $7 trillion in Treasuries are now held by foreigners.  If they begin losing confidence, the government will face a difficult funding problem.

For now, though, there are few other places for them to turn.  Even though yields on U.S. bonds have been pushed down close to historic lows, they are still higher than those attached to the paper issued by other governments around the world.

These days it’s becoming harder to find sovereign debt that even carries a positive yield.  The latest estimates are that $14-$15 trillion in bonds carry negative yields.

It sounds crazy – bonds that obligate holders to pay interest to the issuing borrowers.  But some economists think the negative interest rate syndrome could eventually infect the United States.

In the meantime, Treasury holders face the prospect of earning negative real returns.  That is to say, the yields they earn are at grave risk of falling behind inflation.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 1.7% this week.  That’s below the Fed’s target inflation rate of 2%.  With Jerome Powell and other Fed policymakers endorsing “symmetric” inflation targeting, that means they may let inflation run well above 2% for some time in order to compensate for recent periods of below-2% price level increases.

The entire Treasury yield curve is at risk of falling into negative territory in real terms. It may have already… depending on which inflation gauge you use.

Fortunately for precious metals investors, gold and silver tend to thrive in an environment of negative real interest rates.

 

When real interest rates on paper turn negative, there no longer is an opportunity cost associated with holding gold.  Metals become attractive to hold as alternatives to depreciating paper – and tend to perform well.

Gold and silver bugs certainly have reason to be optimistic. Prices have broken out of large consolidation bases ahead of near certain additional rate cuts from the Fed and a formal shift by the White House toward weak dollar policies.

The one missing piece of the bullish picture is rising inflation pressures.  Although price increases are showing up in some areas of the economy, there is no broad inflationary momentum taking hold.

It will likely take a sustained rise in energy and food commodity prices before inflation fears drive mainstream investors to exit their negative real-yielding bonds and seek protection in precious metals.

The upshot is that the current bull market phase in gold and silver is still very young. Before reaching maturity, it will suffer some setbacks.  One may be due after this recent run up. But the upside potential ahead is far more positive than the yield on any government bond.

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

Thursday, August 8, 2019

The Sound Money Showdown in U.S. States

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/money-currency/the-sound-money-showdown-in-u-s-states/

Policies relating to sound money have been the subject of substantial debate at the state level this year, with bills, hearings, and/or votes taking place in nearly a dozen legislatures.

As most state legislatures have now wrapped up their work for the year, let’s review the victories (both offensive and defensive)—and lone defeat—for sound money during the 2019 session.

The Sound Money Defense League’s primary goal is to remove every kind of taxation imposed on constitutional money. Given its practical importance, the hottest issue in the states has been taxation—i.e. whether citizens should face a levy when buying or selling gold and silver.

  • House Bill 2684, introduced by West Virginia Delegate Pat McGeehan, aimed to remove all taxes (sales tax, corporate income tax, and personal income tax) from gold and silver. Meanwhile, Senate Bill 502, sponsored by Senator Craig Blair, exempted only precious metals from the state’s sales tax.

The West Virginia bill removing sales taxes passed overwhelmingly through both chambers, and Governor Jim Justice signed SB 502 into law.

  • House Bill 2140, introduced by Kansas Representative Jim Kelly, included a sales tax exemption on the sale of gold and silver as part of a larger bill rife with new taxes. Governor Laura Kelly signed the measure in May.
  • Since 2014, Nebraska has recognized gold and silver as money and waives sales taxes on the metals. However, a few tax-revenue-hungry politicians tried to sneak a new sales tax on the metals into a larger bill earlier this year. After sound money advocates and in-state supporters mobilized to persuade Nebraska legislators that taxing money is wrong, the cynical new tax was removed from the bill.
  • Washington State has not collected sales taxes on sound money for more than three decades. This year, however, we faced two serious attacks on gold and silver in Olympia.

Jp Cortez, policy director of the Sound Money Defense League, joined Dan Duncan and other in-state dealers and policy experts to warn legislators of the grave policy error they were considering—a blunder that would drive coin conventions and investment dollars to neighboring states.

After overwhelming backlash from in-state coin dealers, grassroots supporters, and the Sound Money Defense League, both Washington repeal bills died in committee.

  • The battle to preserve an existing sales tax exemption did not succeed in Ohio. Under the dark cloud left by a rare-coin scammer who stole tens of millions of dollars from Buckeye State taxpayer a decade ago, the legislature ignored the pleas of hundreds of taxpayers, business owners, and collectors and revoked the sales-tax exemption for gold and silver.

We’re disappointed in this setback at the hands of tax-hungry politicians. Any tax-revenue proceeds Ohio gains will almost certainly be offset by lost revenues when business and coin conventions flee the state. The Sound Money Defense League hopes to persuade Ohio’s legislature to rectify this policy error in the future.

  • Wisconsin is still considering Assembly Bill 200, introduced by Representative Shae Sortwell. This bill aims to remove sales taxes from gold and silver and should be heard in the fall.
  • Several other states, including Arkansas, Maine, Minnesota, and Tennessee, actively considered measures to remove sales taxes on sound money—with formal hearings occurring in all but Minnesota. Although these efforts came up short this year, a foundation of support has been established for renewed efforts next year.

In total, 39 states now have full or partial exemptions from sales taxes on the monetary metals.

  • Sound money allies in Wyoming introduced three bills to enable the state treasurer to invest state funds in physical gold and silver held securely in or near the state.

These measures ignited a discussion as to whether the state treasurer already has the authority to protect state funds by holding gold—and it put a spotlight on Wyoming’s staggering losses on its investments in Third-World debt (hundreds of millions of dollars lost) while having now ownership in even a single ounce of gold.

While these Wyoming bills did not pass, the Wyoming state treasurer is reportedly exploring how best to incorporate gold into the state’s portfolio to protect its reserves.

  • An ally in Arizona introduced a similar bill to Wyoming’s, but the sunbelt state does not currently have reserve funds which can be allocated to the monetary metals – the state’s modest reserves have been pledged as collateral for bank loans on government buildings!

Sound money is no longer a fringe concept relegated to whispers in dark corners. The Federal Reserve has failed as a steward of the dollar since its creation. Individuals, state legislatures, and even other countries are waking up to the value and importance of sound money.

Grasping the importance of sound money and seeing success at the state level, our allies are expected to introduce additional sound money measures next session. Building on the success of 2019, all eyes are on 2020 as sound money continues to gain acceptance once again.

Jp Cortez is a graduate of Auburn University and a resident of Charlotte, North Carolina. He is the Policy Director of the Sound Money Defense League, an organization working to bring back gold and silver as America’s constitutional money. Follow him on Twitter @JpCortez27

Thursday, August 1, 2019

After Fed Disappoints, Will Trump Initiate Currency Intervention?

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/money-currency/after-fed-disappoints-will-trump-initiate-currency-intervention/

Following months of cajoling by the White House, the Federal Reserve finally cut its benchmark interest rate. However, the reaction in equity and currency markets was not the one President Donald Trump wanted – or many traders anticipated.

The Trump administration wants the Fed to help drive the fiat U.S. dollar lower versus foreign currencies, especially those of major exporting countries.

Instead, the U.S. Dollar Index rallied throughout July ahead of the expected rate cut and continued rallying after Fed chairman Jerome Powell made it official on Wednesday.

In fact, the Federal Reserve Note broke out to its highest level since early 2017.

The Fed also announced it would end its balance sheet reduction program a month earlier than originally scheduled.

These dovish policy changes apparently weren’t dovish enough. The central bank could have gone for a 50-basis-point cut instead of the more routine quarter point cut it delivered. It could also have announced a new Quantitative Easing program.

Perhaps the biggest market-moving disappointment (equity bearish, dollar bullish) was Fed Chairman Jerome Powell shooting down the idea of an extended rate-cutting cycle.

In his press conference, he described the cut as “mid-cycle adjustment” that didn’t necessarily imply follow-up cuts.

As he often does, President Trump vented his displeasure via a tweet:

 “What the Market wanted to hear from Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve was that this was the beginning of a lengthy and aggressive rate-cutting cycle which would keep pace with China, The European Union and other countries around the world….”

Trump is certainly correct in his observation that Europe and other regions are far outpacing of the U.S. in terms of ultra-accommodative monetary policy.

Several countries have now gone to negative interest rate policy. An estimated $13 trillion in negative-yielding bonds now sits in the accounts of holders who are apparently content with losing money at a fixed rate.

Gold and Silver Show Strength in All Currencies

The upshot is that gold and silver have recently been breaking out in terms of euros, yen, yuan, and other foreign currencies.

Precious metals have also fared quite well in terms of Federal Reserve Notes. Even though the Dollar Index rose more than 2% in July, gold managed to come out of the month with a 2% gain. Silver put on an even more impressive 7% advance.

Precious metals are rallying versus all currencies, a good harbinger of a major bull market ahead. When our currency finally turns down, the recent strength in metals could be amplified – big league.

Trump Administration Contemplates Intervening in Currency Markets

As our centrally planned monetary system is currently set up, it’s the responsibility of the Treasury Department – not the Federal Reserve – to manage the value of the U.S. dollar versus foreign currencies.

Toward that end, the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund has the power to carry out both direct and indirect market interventions.

The idea of manipulating our currency value in foreign exchange markets has been discussed by the White House. The idea was recently rejected – at least publicly.

According to a July 26th Bloomberg story, “President Donald Trump has rejected, for now, the idea of aggressive currency intervention that could give the U.S. an edge with its trading partners by weakening the dollar.”

Bloomberg further notes, “officials weighed proposals to publicly talk down the dollar’s value or weaken the greenback by intervening in currency markets using Treasury’s $94 billion exchange stabilization fund.”

Treasury Steven Mnuchin apparently talked Trump out of pursuing a currency manipulation/counter-manipulation scheme. But that was before Jay Powell (who was appointed to the Fed at Mnuchin’s recommendation) came out with a policy statement that pushed the greenback to a two-year high.

Trump could be running out of patience as he fears his re-election campaign will run out of time before voters see any beneficial fruits of his trade battles.

Even if he was talked out of making currency intervention a formal policy of the administration, that doesn’t mean it won’t be carried out anyway behind the scenes, through secret Treasury department operations.

Meanwhile, the Fed is in easing mode with odds still favoring another rate cut by September. No other major central bank is looking to tighten. It’s a race to the bottom.

Regardless of whether Europe, China, Japan, or the United States “wins” by undercutting its currency more than the others, precious metals and commodities will serve as objective measures of value.

Gold, by breaking out to a multi-year high when priced in Federal Reserve Notes and continuing to advance despite its strength versus other fiat currencies, is sending an important message to investors. Namely, it is quite possible to lose real value by holding wealth in a nominally appreciating currency.

Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC, and his writings have appeared in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, Washington Times, and National Review.