Friday, November 22, 2019

David Morgan: Here’s Why You Must Protect Yourself Outside the Financial System…

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-experts/david-morgan-heres-why-you-must-protect-yourself-outside-the-financial-system/

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome back our good friend David Morgan of The Morgan Report. David, it’s good to have you on as always and we appreciate the time today. How are you?

David Morgan: Mike, I’m well. Thank you for having me.

Mike Gleason: Well, we’ve had a significant correction in precious metals prices, especially in silver, and I wanted to get your thoughts on that to start out here. To us, it looked like the bullion banks sold futures contracts to lots of speculators who got interested in metals. Then as often happens, the speculators got taken out to the woodshed. However, open interest appears to still be rising. We would have expected that to fall after a couple weeks of lower prices and pain pushing those longs out of the market, so maybe something else is going on here. What do you make of the recent price correction and where do you think the markets might be headed in the short term? Do you think the selling might be over for now?

David Morgan: I do not. I think there’s probably more so on the head. I mean, it’s possible that we get a lift here to do a fake out from the longs, but I don’t like the structure of the Commitment of Traders. Silver hit about a three-and-a-half year high, which hit $19.65 which I believe was the top of this spot market. And we’ve had several instances over the last six, seven, eight years where the last day of trading was the low pick for the year in the metals. Traditionally they start moving up the end of the year, but that’s not been the seasonality for many years now. So, I think we’re going to drift off lower. It’s possible that the bottom is in, I called the four about a $1,450 on gold, about a 50% retracement from the $200 move that went from $1,350 to $1,550 when it finally broke that six year trading range and it’s done that. But yet in looking at the CoT, I think we probably going to see lower before we see higher.

Mike Gleason: Obviously one asked to kind of check it’s check their premises after a just the long period, especially in silver. Gold of course did reach that six year high silver has never gotten to that point or we haven’t really broken out of the trading range. I’m sure you’re probably doing this all the time, checking your premises and where things are, I mean is gold and silver still going to be a good place to be over the long run despite all the consternation and the difficulty that we’ve seen over the last few years?

David Morgan: Absolutely. I mean we’re facing something that’s really never been, taken place in monetary history at least what we know of recorded history, and we’re seeing the demise of the age of empire. I mean basically everything was built on this system, on money and the money system is actually designed to fail from the start. You cannot have infinite interest rates. And what it mean by that is the, the exponential function, the compounding of interest over and over and over again. They’ll go to infinity eventually. So, we’ve had adjustments and certainly some very big problems throughout monetary history. I mean there’s several that we can name. The point is, I don’t think it’s ever been one of this breadth and scope where basically you know that 7 billion people on the planet and very few will come out unscathed. It’s certainly not the end of the world, but there will be an adjustment and how big how hard and how long that adjustment is, no one really knows.

I think the main thing to do is to one, not panic and to realize that all the wealth stays in place. I mean all the agriculture, all of the oil fields, all the buildings, they’re all still there. But what takes place in a financial adjustment, a currency reset, any words that you want to use, is that the ownership changes basically. So, you have a lot of people that might be over leveraged, and the over leverage will take them out of the game so-to-speak. So, real estate investor that’s on the margin, that’s very leveraged, waiting for, let’s say hyperinflation to bail them out may have made the wrong bet. There will be deflationary forces. It’s inevitable because of the way capital markets are set up. So, when the bond market starts to fail, interest rates will start to be pushed up and that will decrease the value of the bonds.

And since they’re so massive and so widely spread out among the financial capital markets, they basically touch everything… pension plans, retirement savings, savings, even money markets, everything is basically touched by the debt markets. There’s nothing that really could escape it. So, this is something that had my eye on for years and I’ve always stated that, watch the bond market that holds the keys to the kingdom and the bond market really starts to be questioned for its ability to not just pay the interest, but what is the real value something that can never be paid off, i.e. the national debt? Then at some point you’ll probably start to see some movement in the bond market. I think of what happened in my lifetime. I don’t think we’ve got another five years, but people such as myself and others before me have made statements similar to that and then they’re wrong in their timing, and it’s very difficult to say when.

In fact, I was listening to a podcast this morning because I try best to stay up on all of this and his forecast was like 2047 and I forget how it came up with that number, but it never hurts to be early. And as the markets twist and turn the least valued assets right now, particularly silver and gold, somewhat relative to the S&P, the DOW, the real estate market or anything else. So, both metals are undervalued, particularly silver. So, when you buy something undervalued and add it to your portfolio or balance or rebalance your portfolio is something we really should consider.

Mike Gleason: Certainly, a key points that you hit on there is that it’s never bad to be early. You definitely don’t want to be late. Being too early as is not the of the world. Being too late is catastrophic.

It’s obviously not been a whole lot of fun for gold bugs these days. The Fed has returned to cutting interest rates. They are pouring hundreds of billions into the repo markets and they have launched a new program to purchase treasury notes, which looks suspiciously like Quantitative Easing. One might think all of the stimulus along with the trouble the Fed is trying to address in the repo markets would drive precious metals’ prices higher, but that isn’t what happened. For most investors the takeaway from all this extraordinary Fed policy seems to be “buy more stocks” and “there isn’t anything to worry about.” Do you think that is the right takeaway and can the Fed keep this party going a while longer?

David Morgan: Well, it’s not the right takeaway, but it certainly points to the fact that there is a lot of manipulation and control in these markets. I mean anyone that’s subjectively looking at the facts, as you just stated, sees that there’s more money printing going on. This repo thing is scarier than it looks and yet, the stock market continues to make new highs. I’m just repeating back what you said, but fundamentally all those facts should lead to higher precious metals’ prices and they don’t. And why is that? And the reason being, as almost anyone that’s ever listened to me or any most people on your show would say, look, it’s the paper paradigm that runs the futures markets. And that’s how the prices determined. And until that is broken enough for the market to settle based upon the physical market, you have the ability to basically control the price more or less.

And that’s unfortunate. People hear that and they get discouraged and he said, well, you know, why fight the Fed? I’m just going to be in the stock market. I don’t want to be the metals. But as we said in the last segment, it’s important to be prepared for what the eventuality is because nothing grows to the moon. The Fed Is not all mighty, even though it might seem that way at times, and we’re getting near the end. I do believe, I know that’s really tough to time, but I can’t see it going on much longer. Our debt is so high relative with the interest payments are, and this is with low interest rates. If interest rates get pushed higher as I outlined a moment ago that it’s more and more difficult to service the debt. So, no, the fundamental facts have probably never been more important for owning some precious metals.

And yet the market is just worn out. I mean it was a six year trading range for gold. It finally broke above it. It went up rather significantly. $200 on a $1,350 is a pretty good move given up half of it and it’s taken awhile, and people say, “Ah, that’s it.” And it would comment, and of course you could comment on my comment because as you know Mike I talk to many of the wholesalers and retailers in this marketplace and most of the bigger ones as well… and I was told by one rather significantly sized retail dealer that they were getting a four to one ratio, meaning they were buying back from retail, not on the wholesale side, about four times as much gold as they were actually putting through the door. So, most of this move has been based on the bigger money, in other words the ETF’s, hedge funds, banks, you know China, that type of thing.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, certainly that’s similar to our experience as well. Definitely kind of a skewed to one end there. Well we’d like to get your comments on the department of justice investigation of the bullion banks, they have indicted several bankers including six now from JPMorgan. They’ve gotten a few guilty pleas and some of these guys appear to be cooperating. The DOJ is going to be prosecuting using RICO laws, which implies there is evidence which goes beyond cheating by a few rogue traders. They are treating this activity like organized crime. On one hand we’re skeptical about whether the investigation is going to lead to real results. We’ll believe it when we see it when it comes to the federal government doing anything serious about corruption at major Wall Street banks. The banks pretty much own Washington DC, as we saw in 2008 when massive fraud led to exactly zero high level prosecutions and crooked bankers were handed bailouts instead. On the other hand though this prosecution does kind of look like it might be going somewhere. Do you think the DOJ might be serious about this investigation?

David Morgan: Oh, I certainly hope so. I agree with you. I mean, I’m on record as having said there’s going to be another, you know, wrist slap and that would be about it. But now that you know more are involved and it seems like there’s a bit of a pit bull attitude, meaning that the DOJ hasn’t given up or going away very easily this time. I am optimistic that may be just maybe they will actually pursue some justice in this case. It remains to be determined. So I’m slightly optimistic that I could have been wrong earlier when I said it’d be nothing more than another, you know, wind up everybody and then it’s just a wrist slap, pay the fine and go back to business as usual. It certainly hasn’t changed the trading structure of the COT. That would be one indication to me that the banks are scared that there’s going to be some real effort put forth to this investigation and the prosecution process. And so far it has not indicated that.

Mike Gleason: Getting back to metals prices here, David, the gold to silver ratio has been quite stubbornly stuck in the mid-eighties about 85 to one as we’re talking here today, we saw it get up to about 90 to one earlier this year and after a summer rally it fell. But I don’t think it quite got below 80 to one at any point. Although maybe it did inner day perhaps sometime over the summer, I don’t recall exactly. So, it seems like the ratio, like silver, is really stuck in a range. It’s between say, 80 and 90 to one. So, what do you make of the gold to silver ratio, David?

David Morgan: Well, it’s historically high. It’s been as high as a hundred a few times since the crime, 1873 when silver was really demonetized. When you have silver and gold performing the same function, which means money, it’s never traded above 20 to one. So, if you go back to ancient Egypt till 1873, basically, silver had a ratio of 20 ounces of silver to one ounce of gold or lower most of the time, lower like 12 to one 10 to one nine to one, that type of thing, until it became a commodity only. And so it really depends on how things on unravel going forward. And when the monetary demand for gold accelerates, it will spill over to the silver market. And once silver is thought of more on a monetary basis for investment basis, for protection basis or anything that you associate with protecting capital or making capital gains, that’s when you’ll see the ratio come down.

And I’m certain that it will, it’s just hard at this point in time when things have gone on for a long time. I mean the peak in silver was the end of April or early May 2011 and here we are at the year 2019 and silver has not performed as well as gold. Gold’s at a six-year high, but silver hit a three and a half year high and fell off rapidly. So it’s tough. I do still believe in the metals and it’s not because I’m stubborn is because I studied monetary history so deeply and intensively, and I know the outcome ahead is not one that’s very pretty for the fiat system and it’s apparent. I mean, if you just forget everything I’ve ever said about the precious metals, just look in the landscape of money as it’s perceived right now, there’s lots of alternative things going on in the monetary system.

Bitcoin is probably the prime example. There’s somebody somewhere that said, “Look, I’ve had enough with what the government’s control I’m going to try this one.” And of course there were a lot of copycats out there, but this is what happens at the end of the age of not only impart the end of the age of a currency experiment that has always failed in the past. So, that’s a good indicator. It doesn’t have to just be gold and silver as an alternative. They’re all alternatives that are coming to the fore all the time. Of course you have precious metals back cryptos to some extent and you have others that are associated with the different commodities and you have some that are just fiat, basically. They’re just an edict that says we’re only going to make this many. There’s some that are unlimited. Nonetheless, the main point is that there is a striving to find an alternative to the current monetary system.

Mike Gleason: Yeah. There certainly something that continues to go on underneath the surface when it comes to our monetary system and yeah, people need to take note of that and recognize that none of the problems of the last eight, 10 years have been resolved to any extent. In fact, they’ve only become worse. So, I think when we’re talking about checking our premises as precious metals minded folks, we need to keep that in mind.

Well lastly, David, let’s get to any final comments that you may want to leave us with today. Perhaps something that we haven’t covered yet. What are you going to be watching most closely or what do you think people ought to be focusing on?

David Morgan: Well, as I’ve always stated, I think the best thing to do, if you are inclined to understand where we are in our current economic system, it’s probably very wise to have some precious metals. And if you want to go beyond that… I mean, I don’t really like the state when I heard it, but it’s absolutely true…. one of these old timers, when I spoke to the Society of Mining Engineers very early on in this career, after my talk a guy came up and said, “Oh, I’ve always made more money and paper silver than I ever have paid in silver, silver.” And what he meant was not futures, he didn’t even mean options. What he meant was the mining equities. And so this is true. I mean, for example, when we had a great run in 2016 and I thought that the bull market had restarted for the precious metals certainly looked like it at the time, but at turned out I was wrong.

It might’ve been a false start. I’m not going to make an excuse. I was wrong. Nonetheless, it was a very big ramp up for the metals. We had a silver and gold performed from January 2016 all the way into September and then they started to correct. The point is the silver made a pretty nice percentage move, but we’ve traded First Majestic almost perfectly during that timeframe and during that timeframe it outperformed the metal like five to one. So, there are times when equities do play a part of the portfolio, but they’re for aggressive investors. It’s not something that’s a casual buy and hold type of situation. These are volatile, high beta, meaning high volatility stocks, and you pretty much have to know what you’re doing to perform well in a portfolio. And again, it would be part of an overall structure. It wouldn’t be just those shares because they do move up and down so rapidly.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, you either need to really know what you’re doing and how to identify and decipher a geologic survey put out by a mining company or you just need to get hooked up with people like The Morgan Report and let them do a lot of that analysis for you, like you’ve been doing such a great job over the years. Well, good stuff, David. It’s always a real pleasure and we appreciate your insights once again. Now before we let you go on that note, let’s tell people about The Morgan Report and how they can get on board and then follow you more closely.

David Morgan: Sure. Just go to TheMorganReport.com, our main website, give me a first name and an email. We’ll put you on the free list. You’ll get a weekly update, I call it the Weekly Perspective. I talk about the most important financial news that you probably won’t find anywhere else. Some of it’s mainstream, like a Bloomberg or Reuters or whatever. These are articles dug out that most people overlook or don’t have the time to find. And then I usually wrap up the end of the segment with some comment or commentary on both gold and silver, and it’s a good way to kind of catch the, let’s say, alternative view of the news. And it’s not just bloggers or anything like that. A lot of stuff is mainstream, but you got to know where to look to find it. And the main theme over the last say, several months, Mike, has been, there’s really a contraction in the global economy.

And the second thing is that we have a food situation that’s going to hit everybody here probably in the not too distant future. Probably within the next six months, year at the most. And this is something that may spark the metals because it’s pretty hard to hide rising food costs, or rising energy cost. The two things that Americans particularly pay attention to is how much does it cost me to eat? How much does it cost me to fill up my tank of gas? And so, I think that could, I’m not saying would but could, be a catalyst for people to say, “Why is this costing me so much, there must be inflation.” And in a way it is, but in other ways it was supply and demand. So, it’s going to be interesting to see how things progress during these very, very turbulent times and I don’t want to be overly aggressive on the gloom, doom type of scenario.

Certainly there’s a lot more to life than money, but nonetheless I think a chance favors the prepared mind. So, if you are prepared, you can sleep well at night and regardless if I’m off by a factor of a decade or not… it’s something, if you’re my age, you might pass on their kids… as long as you don’t over invest I think it’s actually the best way to protect yourself financially cause it’s outside of the current system. And that’s a key point that some have said but probably isn’t emphasized enough and everything fails as a thought experiment. Let’s say as an example, the banks go down because of some electrical failure somewhere. You can always go to your trusty coins and there they are, and they always have value. So, I’ll leave it at that Mike.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, very well put a good summary there and couldn’t agree more. Well, thanks again David. I hope you have a great Thanksgiving and we’ll be catching up with you again down the road. Take care of my friend.

David Morgan: All right, you too. Thank you.

 

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

 

 

Why You Should “Follow the Money” on The Yellow (and Silver) Brick Road

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/why-you-should-follow-the-money-on-the-yellow-and-silver-brick-road/

Since the Federal Reserve detached the dollar from the gold standard in 1971, the world’s central bankers – with the Fed leading the charge, have flooded the world with fiat currency to the point of diminishing its purchasing power to shadow status.

A common belief during the early decades of the former Soviet Union’s rise after 1917 was that, according to Marxist-Leninist theory, the West and capitalism would either self-destruct, or be “buried” by the superior economic platform being constructed for the proletariat by the USSR, and later Communist China.

But even the Great Depression, which in the West lasted from the Crash of 1929, and arguably into WWII, failed to do the trick.

Much later, in a case of great historical irony, the West received a Christmas present of sorts, when on December 26, 1991 the Supreme Soviet voted itself and the USSR out of existence!

However, to say that the world is moving into uncharted waters as we head into 2020 could turn out to be a monumental understatement!

On the surface, the U.S. still enjoys – so far – a 10-year stock market bull run, record low employment, and fairly stable consumer prices. But under the hood, we’re piling up massive long-term debts which have little chance of being paid back at anything near today’s purchasing power.

Pouring more paper and electronic bytes into the system in order to stimulate growth is having the opposite effect. Consider the €15 trillion in Eurozone-issued paper, now literally paying less than nothing and accomplishing about as much.

Fiat currency simply floats to the top of the heap where it fuels market bubbles, stock buybacks, bigger management bonuses, and investments in billion-dollar (non)startups like WeWork.

The middle class once looked forward to “clipping” bond coupons during their “golden” years but are now being greeted with what the Bank of England calls “the lowest interest rates in 5,000 years.”

Meanwhile, Russia has become the world’s third largest gold producer (after China and Australia) and continues to import even more, with central banks doing the same!

Slowly the “powers that be” are starting to come clean about their (private) love – (public) hate relationship with gold, hinting that it just might have some redeeming features. The Dutch National Bank recently said:

“Gold is… the trust anchor for the financial system. If the whole system collapses, the gold stock provides a collateral to start over. Gold gives confidence in the power of the central bank’s balance sheet.”

 

So there you have it!

Our financial crystal ball is still a bit cloudy right now, but it’s not a stretch to consider that the global financial tectonic plates are under considerable stress as multi-causal socio-political factors conspire to grind them ever more tightly.

Keeping in mind that the pronouncements of news outlets on the mainland tend to closely align with the views of Bejing’s rulers, and that the Party speaks of important matters obliquely, the Global Financial Times, China recently had this to say:

So the gold standard is an effort by the world market and financial system to balance the “Trumpian future.” It means that the US can take its own path and Americans will have the right to look after themselves, but other countries around the world will also have the right to make their own choices.

In other words this will be a process of rebalancing in the world financial market, forcing the US to face up to problems. It needs to make a choice: fulfill the obligations and responsibilities for international finance, or abandon the international status of the dollar, thus allowing the dollar to become a common currency…

For the US, the gold standard is a choice that cannot be avoided. The existence of the choice matters a lot. Central banks would increase their holdings of gold reserves to prepare for the return of the gold standard. Gold prices will rise. Besides that, the most important thing is whether the US is willing to accept any big change or wants to return to the old financial order…

 

In short, it’s an odds-on bet that over the next few years, profound structural changes are in store for the world financial system.

As China, Russia and other key players attempt to “re-rate” the US dollar from Reserve Currency, top-dog status to “a common currency,” we should pay attention and adjust our personal financial profiles accordingly.

The Veterans Day 2019 $5.50 Silver Spike

On Veterans Day, in thin market conditions, an intra-day silver spike turned out to be a false signal. But what if it had been for real and on the open for the next trading day, the price had held, or even moved up to $25? And you had no silver? What now, sport?

One of these days, a surprise move like this for both gold and silver could be for real.

We don’t need to predict exactly when in order to protect ourselves and make sure we’re “involved” by having some metal insurance. Why allow ourselves to be relegated to the status of long-term spectators – minus the binoculars?

Once gold gets a few closes above its intermediate high around $1,575, perhaps before year end or soon thereafter, it will be motivated to run toward the next “resistance” level around $1,700 – as a start.

So don’t wait to act until the obvious is well under way. Get yourself positioned to play the long game and the Big Move.

As Nick Barisheff succinctly puts it, “The small minority of wealth preservationists will sleep well with their physical gold and silver, whilst the majority of the asset management industry are likely to have nightmares for many years.”

Act soon to acquire enough physical gold and silver so you can sleep well, counting your Maple Leafs and Silver Eagles, while others are counting sheep… or sitting up in bed with a bad case of FOMO – the Fear Of Missing Out.

 

David Smith is Senior Analyst for TheMorganReport.com and a regular contributor to MoneyMetals.com. For the past 15 years, he has investigated precious metals’ mines and exploration sites in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Bolivia, China, Canada, and the U.S. He shares his resource sector findings with readers, the media, and North American investment conference attendees.

Cracks Spread in the Bullion Banks’ Price Management System

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/physical-market/cracks-spread-in-the-bullion-banks-price-management-system/

Department of Justice prosecutors charged a sixth JPMorgan executive for cheating in the precious metals markets.

Jeffrey Ruffo stands accused of racketeering and spoofing metals prices from 2008 – 2016, along with other crimes including conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

The indictment outlines nearly a decade spent coordinating with other traders in JPMorgan’s precious metals department to rig prices. The activity includes thousands of fraudulent trades placed for two purposes.

The first was to benefit favored JPMorgan clients at the expense of other investors.

The second was to benefit JPMorgan and the traders directly by cheating their own clients.

The investigation is ongoing, and more indictments, including charges against traders at other bullion banks, may be on the way. It appears that at least some of the executives now facing prison time have decided to cooperate and provide evidence against others involved.

The DOJ prosecutions are certainly a step in the right direction. It is getting harder for even the staunchest defenders of futures trading to dismiss price manipulation as a mere conspiracy theory.

The genuine prospect of prison time may be giving pause to any crooked bankers still working in the gold and silver markets. And, the story should be an eye opener for bullion bank clients and speculators still gambling in the rigged casino also known as the COMEX.

For those who have been watching this story, it is hard to fathom why anyone is still expecting fair treatment in the futures markets. It is clear, however, that plenty of confidence remains. Gold open interest made new all-time highs last week.

As long as investors rely upon the COMEX and other exchanges for price discovery, it is the job of federal regulators to do something to curb the rampant cheating. Unfortunately, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the primary regulator for futures markets, is still

Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV)
has emerged as a leader in the sound money movement.

captured and/or incompetent.

The CFTC has taken no responsibility for its failed 5-year investigation of price manipulation in the silver market. Agency officials somehow managed to overlook the massive pile of evidence that DOJ investigators have rounded up.

They have taken almost no action despite the DOJ indictments and guilty pleas. JPMorgan is still active in the markets even though its bullion trading desk seems to operate like a criminal enterprise.

CFTC officials are in a quandary similar to those who constantly dismiss allegations of price manipulation as mere conspiracy theory.

It is getting harder and harder for them to ignore the facts.

Congressman Alex Mooney from West Virginia is asking Attorney General Bill Barr to have a look at the price rigging which continues largely unchecked by the CFTC. Price spoofing may just be the tip of the iceberg in terms of criminal activity.

The Congressmen previously sent letters to the CFTC with pointed questions about some of the questionable activity in the futures markets, but has yet to get a response.

All this begs the question about what the CFTC might do if dozens of bankers at multiple banks are ultimately convicted. Will officials there still be able to sit on their hands and protect their crooked friends on Wall Street from enforcement?

 

 

Clint Siegner is a Director at Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of Linfield College in Oregon, Siegner puts his experience in business management along with his passion for personal liberty, limited government, and honest money into the development of Money Metals’ brand and reach. This includes writing extensively on the bullion markets and their intersection with policy and world affairs.

Monday, November 18, 2019

DOJ Asked to Examine New Systemic Risk in Gold & Silver Markets

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/physical-market/doj-asked-to-examine-new-systemic-risk-in-gold-silver-markets/

Impeachment circus lows and stock market highs dominated the news cycle this week, and precious metals are quietly attempting a recovery.

Bulls still have some work to do to repair the technical damage inflicted on both metals during last week’s selling. Gold and silver still face some overhead resistance and the potential for concentrated short selling by financial institutions in the futures markets.

Significant price bottoms are usually reached after the commercial sellers force the speculative longs to capitulate. We certainly saw some of that last week. Whether there is one final washout ahead remains to be seen.

Futures market manipulation of precious metals prices remains an obstacle to free and fair price discovery. Despite some recent prosecutions involving price rigging by banks, the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee believes the rabbit hole goes much deeper.

The Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee reported this week that U.S. Representative Alex Mooney of West Virginia is pushing Attorney General Bill Barr to pursue additional investigations of price rigging in the futures markets. Mooney raises concern in particular about a mechanism for settling metals contracts called “exchange for physicals.” He notes this may pose “some danger of a systemic issue.”

Both Mooney and GATA have repeatedly raised questions with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that have gone unanswered. Perhaps Attorney General Barr’s office will be more responsive to credible allegations of criminal manipulation in the precious metals markets.

In the meantime, metals investors will have to be prepared for more artificially induced price volatility in their holdings. The best way to beat the paper manipulators long term is to avoid playing in their rigged casino and keep accumulating precious metals in physical form.  The supply and demand fundamentals of the physical market will ultimately win out and force their hand.

Futures contracts, exchange-traded funds, and other derivative products tied to gold and silver prices are no substitute for the real thing. Only the actual metal is a time-tested store of value and hedge against financial turmoil including the risk of an inflation outbreak.

Speaking of inflation, on Wednesday the Labor Department reported that U.S. consumer prices rose more than expected in October. The consumer price index increased 0.4% last month as households faced higher costs for food, energy, healthcare, and a range of other goods. It was the largest monthly CPI gain since March.

Many economists believe the CPI actually understates real-world inflation. The Federal Reserve has other preferred gauges for estimating inflation, but they all have their flaws as well.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell talks over and over again about pursuing a “symmetrical” 2% inflation target. But this number is completely arbitrary and is found nowhere in the central bank’s original “stable prices” mandate.

Prospective Federal Reserve Board nominee Judy Shelton is skeptical of the prevailing thinking at the Fed on inflation. Shelton was floated by President Donald Trump as a Fed member several months ago and is still waiting for an opportunity to be confirmed by the Senate.

She will have a difficult time given her unorthodox but very common sense views on things like true price stability. She appeared on CNBC this week and offered these thoughts:

Judy Shelton: There are so many indices for evaluating inflation that right away, it’s confusing. Of course, for me, a dependable dollar wouldn’t lose value at all. Instead, we have this regimented built in 2% obsolescence and I would rather, and I think Paul Volcker has expressed this as well, not have 2% because that very easily can become 4%. I’ve seen some economists saying, well that would make life a lot easier for central bankers. They would have more room to maneuver, but it makes life infinitely more complicated for the people who have to use money.

I’m leery that the Fed now talks about symmetrical inflation. If they ever do hit their target, it now sounds like they’re willing to go above that amount for a non-determined period of time so that somehow they balance out and say, well, over the long run we hit 2%. At least, people are not listing inflation as their primary concern these days, but still it’s a very interesting intellectual challenge to discuss what is the right rate of inflation. I guess I prefer zero.

Sound money advocates would certainly welcome Shelton’s perspective having a seat at the Fed’s policy making table. She has previously expressed support for reintroducing gold into the monetary system as a way of tethering the value of the dollar to something solid.

But for now, the monetary system isn’t tethered to anything except the unlimited demand by bankers and politicians for new dollars to be created out of thin air.

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

Congressman Prods Attorney General on Gold, Silver Trading Questions Ignored by CFTC

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/physical-market/congressman-prods-attorney-general-on-gold-silver-trading-questions-ignored-by-cftc/

A U.S. representative who has been pressing the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with questions about the gold and silver markets has asked Attorney General William P. Barr to try intervene and get answers from the commission.

In a letter dated November 1 and made public today, the U.S. representative, Alex W. Mooney, Republican of West Virginia, CTFCcommends Barr for the Justice Department’s recent criminal prosecution of manipulation in the monetary metals futures markets.

But Mooney calls attention to the explosion in use of a mechanism called “exchange for physicals” for settling metals futures contracts in the United States, a mechanism that, Mooney contends, may pose “some danger of a systemic issue” if, as seems to be the case, those settlements are being transferred to European markets.

Further, Mooney complains to the attorney general that the CFTC is “apparently unwilling to answer a few straightforward questions which I and others have repeatedly posed, including questions about unusual activity” in the exchange for physicals mechanism.

Mooney questioned the CFTC in a letter sent February 5, echoing questions already posed by GATA and ignored by the commission.

The commission has not replied to him despite repeated inquiries.

“Given the CFTC’s delays in answering questions about these notable developments,” Mooney writes in his letter to the attorney general, “I would like the Department of Justice to examine the matter and provide me with the scope and purpose of EFP use, its legality, and whether full disclosure of EFP activity is (or should be) required.”

“Additionally, please let me know whether the CFTC’s jurisdiction extends to trading by the U.S. government and/or its agents or if such activity is exempt from oversight.

“With the recent explosion in EFPs,” Mooney concludes, “the CFTC’s failure to detect and/or prosecute criminal manipulation by participants in the precious metals markets is disturbing and needs to be addressed.”

Like GATA’s, Mooney’s inquiries seek to determine if the U.S. government or its agents are trading in the monetary metals markets for currency market rigging purposes and if such trading is subject to ordinary antitrust and commodity trading law and CFTC jurisdiction or is exempt under the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 as amended since then.

Mooney’s letter to the attorney general is reproduced in full here.

We urge U.S. citizens to write to their own members of Congress calling attention to Mooney’s letter and asking them to make similar requests for information from the attorney general and the CFTC.

Chris Powell is a political columnist and former managing editor at the Journal Inquirer, a daily newspaper in Manchester, Connecticut, USA, where he has worked since graduating from high school in 1967. His column published in newspapers throughout Connecticut. He is also secretary/treasurer of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc., (GATA) which he co-founded in 1999 to expose and oppose the rigging of the gold marker by Western central banks and their investment bank agents.

 

 

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

What to Do NOW in Case of a Future Banking System Breakdown

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-insights/what-to-do-now-in-case-of-a-future-banking-system-breakdown/

The banking system may not be as sound we’ve been led to believe. It continues to get propped up through central bank interventions, which strongly suggests it wouldn’t be able to stand on its own.

Last Thursday, the Federal Reserve injected another $115 billion into financial markets via “temporary operations.” The Fed is targeting the repo market in particular, through which banks lend to each other on an overnight basis.

For some reason, banks have grown weary of committing liquidity to each other in what should be one of the safest lending markets on the planet.

Perhaps they are being overly cautious. Perhaps they (or one in particular) are simply being opportunistic.

After all, the liquidity shortage in the repo market led to a massive deluge of subsidized liquidity from the Federal Reserve and the launch of what is effectively a new phase of Quantitative Easing. When something goes wrong in the financial system, banks win.

JPMorgan Chase may have triggered the whole mini-crisis by moving more than $130 billion of excess cash out of the pool of reserves. That created a domino effect that tightened overall liquidity in the interbank lending market.

Former Congressman Ron Paul proffers another explanation:

“One cause of the repo market’s sudden cash shortage was the large amount of debt instruments issued by the Treasury Department in late summer and early fall. Banks used resources they would normally devote to private sector lending and overnight loans to purchase these Treasury securities.

This scenario will likely keep recurring as the Treasury Department will have to continue issuing new debt instruments to finance continuing increases in in government spending.”

 

Regardless of the cause, if the Fed had not intervened millions of people with holdings in bank accounts and money market funds could have seen their wealth diminish or even disappear.

Although Jerome Powell and company have apparently stabilized the repo market (for now), questions remain about systemic risks in the financial system.

Critics of fractional reserve banking have long noted that it renders banks inherently vulnerable to bank runs.

Prior to the Federal Reserve System backstop and FDIC “insurance” for deposits, banks had to maintain much larger equity cushions. Some backed deposits dollar for dollar. Today major banks are so highly leveraged, they may only have 5 cents in reserve for every dollar of deposits.

A plunge in their capital value, a major economic downturn, or a crisis event that triggered mass withdrawals could render most banks insolvent. Since major banks have been deemed “too big to fail,” the government and the central bank would stand ready to bail them out.

But what if the authorities fall so far behind the curve that the whole financial system one day collapses on itself?

That came dangerously close to happening in 2008. Had the Fed let one more iconic financial institution go the way of Lehman Brothers, all the big banks may have quickly followed suit. Customer deposits would have been frozen until the authorities figured out how to bail out or bail in the banks on an unprecedented scale.

Money market funds should maintain a stable value even during severe downturns in stock or bond markets. In practice, they could be vulnerable to a “black swan” event that hits the financial system in a way nobody expects.

When such an event occurred in 2008, some large money market funds “broke the buck” – at least temporarily – and failed to maintain their promised stable value. Money market assets held via a brokerage account or mutual fund are generally not insured.

Treasury-only money market funds can be held to minimize credit risk.

They hold only short-term U.S. Treasury bills. During a credit crunch, Treasuries would theoretically be the safest, most liquid IOUs to hold – especially since the Federal Reserve has now committed to purchasing T-bills on a monthly basis.

Of course, T-bills aren’t guaranteed to preserve purchasing power. They are instead virtually guaranteed to lose purchasing power over time versus inflation.

Holding hard assets outside the banking system is therefore a must if you want to protect against the risks to the financial system as well as the currency that underpins it. Gold and silver are the ultimate money and could become premier “growth” assets during a monetary crisis.

The last thing you’d want to do with your precious metals is get them tied up inside the banking system.

Safe-deposit boxes at banks are generally not suitable for precious metals storage. Some banks have policies that explicitly prohibit storing gold bullion. Regardless, your gold would be at risk in the event the bank goes under or gets raided by government agents.

We’re not here suggesting that you immediately liquidate and close all your bank accounts. Going unbanked would be an awful inconvenience for most people. Instead, just be sure you hold some liquid wealth outside the financial system sufficient to get you through any potential banking breakdowns.

 

Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC, and his writings have appeared in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, Washington Times, and National Review.

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

New Evidence Futures Markets Are Built for Manipulation

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/physical-market/new-evidence-futures-markets-are-built-for-manipulation/

The recent price smash in precious metals is frustrating for goldbugs. It is even more infuriating for those who look at the fundamental reasons to own gold and silver and see prices falling anyway.

That’s why it’s worth explaining once again the real purpose of the futures markets, where prices are set. Some recent revelations about Bitcoin futures will help.

The CME launched a Bitcoin futures contract in December of 2017, and many cryptocurrency fans cheered. Those who cheered expected “institutional” money to pour into Bitcoin. Their mistakes were in Puppet Master - market manipulationassuming the institutions would be making long bets on Bitcoin and the futures market would be free and fair.

At the time, we pointed out why savvy gold investors knew better. They realize that the nation’s most powerful institutions – Wall Street banks and the Federal government – don’t like Bitcoin. This hatred by the establishment is something the cryptocurrency shares with gold.

These institutions have spent more than a century building a crooked financial and currency system which benefits them. The futures market is one tool they use to vigorously defend it.

Despite all the optimism, since futures trading launched in late 2017 the Bitcoin price has fallen by more than half. Almost nobody talks excitedly about the launch of BTC futures market trading anymore.

However, there are still those hoping for a Bitcoin ETF to gain approval. Let them be warned.

For anyone wondering why the price of Bitcoin rocketed downward instead of upward after institutions got access to futures trading, Christopher Giancarlo – the former Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman – just provided the explanation.

 

“One of the untold stories of the past few years is that the CFTC, the Treasury, the SEC and the [National Economic Council] director at the time, Gary Cohn, believed that the launch of Bitcoin futures would have the impact of popping the Bitcoin bubble. And it worked.”

 

Federal regulators had a purpose when they authorized the launch of futures trading. They wanted to pop the “Bitcoin bubble.”

And the institutions who lined up and took the leveraged short side of all those contracts enjoyed massive profits when the price collapsed.

Nixon closes gold windowInvestors should never make the mistake of assuming bankers and their friends in Washington have honest intentions, or that they care about free markets.

Thanks to Wikileaks, we know this strategy has been used before. They published some official discussion of the true purpose of futures markets from 1974 – when U.S. officials were planning the launch of leveraged gold trading.

It was a critical time for the U.S. dollar. President Nixon had closed the gold window, removing the last vestige of gold backing for the dollar.

Officials wanted to make the new, purely fiat dollar look stronger and discourage direct ownership of gold.

The following is an excerpt from a memo sent by the Treasury Department in London to the U.S. State Department.

TO THE DEALERS’ EXPECTATIONS, WILL BE THE FORMATION OF A SIZABLE GOLD FUTURES MARKET. EACH OF THE DEALERS EXPRESSED THE BELIEF THAT THE FUTURES MARKET WOULD BE OF SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION AND PHYSICAL TRADING WOULD BE MINISCULE BY COMPARISON. ALSO EXPRESSED WAS THE EXPECTATION THAT LARGE VOLUME FUTURES DEALING WOULD CREATE A HIGHLY VOLATILE MARKET. IN TURN, THE VOLATILE PRICE MOVEMENTS WOULD DIMINISH THE INITIAL DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL HOLDING AND MOST LIKELY NEGATE LONG-TERM HOARDING BY U.S. CITIZENS.

 

Federal politicians and Wall Street bankers have a strategic interest in protecting the U.S. dollar from alternative currencies. Their playbook:

  1. Launch a futures market contract to increase price volatility and discourage direct ownership of the asset.
  2. Turn a blind eye when banks build massive short positions and then rig prices lower, raking in massive profits.

This playbook is how metals investors can make sense of the most recent, totally counter-intuitive, smash in metals prices. It explains, at least in part, how the bullish momentum was crushed.

The futures markets are used by institutions to punish investors for doing the right thing.

That isn’t to suggest investors ought to surrender and be herded by the bankers and bureaucrats into the dollar and other favored assets. But they will need to be prepared for artificial volatility in hard money alternatives.

Don’t forget, these people are definitely not our friends.

 

Clint Siegner is a Director at Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of Linfield College in Oregon, Siegner puts his experience in business management along with his passion for personal liberty, limited government, and honest money into the development of Money Metals’ brand and reach. This includes writing extensively on the bullion markets and their intersection with policy and world affairs.

David Jensen: Gold & Silver to Head Dramatically Higher, Mirroring Palladium

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/david-jensen-gold-silver-to-head-dramatically-higher-mirroring-palladium/

Mike Gleason: It is my privilege now to welcome in David Jensen of Jensen Strategic and a highly studied mining analyst and precious metals expert with close to two decades of experience in the mining industry. And it’s great to have him back on with us.

David, thanks so much for the time again today, and it’s nice to talk to you again. Welcome.

David Jensen: Thank you, Mike. It’s good to be back with you again.

Mike Gleason: Well, David, we had you back on at the beginning of the year and you shared some amazing insights on palladium, and we’ll get to that in a bit because that market is still very interesting. But first off, you’ve been watching the Fed balance sheet closely here and I wanted to get your comments about that to begin with. Now, after the extraordinary expansion, which followed the 2008 financial crisis and a few rounds of QE, the Fed began contracting the money supply in 2017. You’ve been making the case that the withdrawal of liquidity could trigger another catastrophe.

So, let’s start with the basics here. If you would, please explain the history of the Fed’s balance sheet, and why it is something investors should be carefully watching.

David Jensen: Yeah, I think that the root of it all, the reason we’re watching so closely is the tremendous imbalance between the amount of cash, liquid cash that’s in the system versus the amount of debt. And the Fed has run interest rates from around 20% in 1980 down to 0% or 0.25% here a couple of years ago. And what they’ve done is expanded the greatest debt bubble in history. The total debt in the U.S., now on all levels according to the Fed’s flow of funds report is about $72 trillion. And to serve as that $72 trillion of debt that’s in extent, there’s only $14 trillion of liquid currency in deposits and in physical cash. So, what we’re seeing now is that the Fed needs to continually to expand the money stock with the money supply. The money supply is the annual change or the addition to the outstanding money stocked addition to the $14 trillion that’s out every year. And they need to add a substantial amount so that the debt can be serviced and so that the economy can continue to move forward.

And what they’ve done in the last three years, since Q1 2017, they’ve contracted the money supply, which is, again, the year over year change, they’ve decreased that increase down to about 3% from roughly about 11% in Q4 2016. So really a precipitous drop.

And so what we’re seeing now is that the rise of the interest rates and the, and the cutoff of the money supply, they’ve basically withdrawn about a one and a half trillion dollars of additional liquidity, which would be here if it continued to run it at the same run rate as in Q4 2016. So, they’ve withdrawn or tightened a substantial amount. And as interest rates go up, it also, over time, generates a need for about another $2 trillion per annum in interest payments. So what they’ve done is they’ve really created a liquidity crisis here in the market. There’s not enough money to pay the debt that’s outstanding. And, of course, the most levered or the most unstable borrowers show the distress first when these things happen. And that’s what we saw in the repo market here in September, was that that market started to seize up because the capital wasn’t there to meet the needs.

Mike Gleason: Kind of leads me right into my next question. The Fed has really been pumping lots and lots of money into that repo market and they’ve extended it multiple times. You see this intervention in the repo markets as the “first domino to fall,” and what might be the next financial crisis. The Fed, is as usual, not bothering to explain itself, but we know that, we’re pretty sure, that it isn’t good. Give us some more of your insights on that repo market intervention and why it could be the signal of larger troubles ahead.

David Jensen: Yeah, it’s a signal of illiquidity in the financial market. So any borrower of size, a hedge fund or a money manager, a bank can step into that market and borrow in that market in return for providing collateral, whether it’s a treasury or some other type of security. And that market basically dried up because the liquidity was not there, it wasn’t available. But the issue that I really see is at the core of this, is that leverage loan market, which is the most highly indebted borrowers. And that market collapsed in Q1 2008 and kicked off the great financial crisis. And that market, now, there’s a tremendous decay in the credit worthiness of the borrowers in that market. So we’re seeing the signs here that there’s a collapse in the credit worthiness of the most highly leveraged in society.

And just to give you a sense of the repo market, Mike, it’s about a $5 trillion market and about three and a half to $4 trillion of that rolls on a nightly basis. So they’re just 24 hour loans. So any kind of a seizure in that market can cause great problems in the financial markets as a whole. But the greater question is, is why is this market seizing up to begin with? What is the problem here? And the problem that I maintain is this continual drying out of the economy and taking away liquidity from the economy that’s gone on ever since the beginning of 2017.

Mike Gleason: So, the Fed’s created a problem by contracting the money supply. Is there any chance that this sudden about-face, the repo market interventions and the new bond purchase program, that we’re not supposed to call Kiwi four, by the way, will that be enough to prevent disaster, David?

David Jensen: Well, you’re talking about a net shortfall that’s occurred now in the order of trillions of dollars. And it takes years for monetary policy changes to impact the economy as a whole. So, you’ve got many trillions and it has to basically infiltrate the economy, the money expansion as it occurs has to disperse throughout the economy and be utilized. And we’re at the point now where so many of the unstable bubble activities have been tripped out. I believe that they’re not going to be able to address this with monetary policy, it just takes too long and the drying out of the economy of monetary liquidity has gone on for too long to date. The damage is already done.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, we would agree. It’s going to be interesting to watch things continue to unfold there, but we know that we don’t know the full story, I think, when it comes to all this repo market stuff.

Well, turning to palladium now, we had you on back in January of this year. And we spoke quite a bit about the palladium situation. At the time, there was a major supply shortage in that market and since then, things haven’t changed too much and we’ve seen the price of palladium go from a little over $1,300 back in January to nearly $1,800 here today. So what’s the latest on palladium and why have we seen this amazing resilience? Because not many in the metals community would have expected the meteoric rise to continue and then see it remain so firm and never really show signs of cracking or experiencing any real pullback, to speak of. So what’s going on with palladium now, David?

David Jensen: Well, it’s a good old fashioned shortage. The conundrum or the question is, why is there a metal shortage when the auto industry is in free fall? About 80% of palladium is used in catalytic converters in automobiles. And you would think that the demand would decline along with the production of autos. But I think there’s another dynamic at play here, is that the Eurozone have been practicing very loose monetary policies, as many of the banks around the world. And I think that at the margins, these are very small markets compared to the amount of capital out there. All the gold in the world is worth just one or 2% of the total capital markets out there. So, what we’re seeing now with palladium, which is a fraction of the size of the gold market, I mean, the above ground stocks are nothing and annual production is in the order of about a 10th of the amount of gold.

But I think what’s happening here that’s driving the shortage, and since we talked in January, the lease rates have started to spike up again. We’re now seeing the lease rates, on average, in and around the 8% level. So in London where this metal is traded and where there’s actual delivery of metal, is insufficient metal there to meet the market demand. But I think that there’s demand, it’s not just auto demand that’s out there. I think that if you look back in 2016, the German government went negative with the bunds there for the first time, the market did. And I think what you have is just that at the margins, enough investors start to buy real assets, including these intrinsically valuable assets like palladium and platinum, gold and silver.

But that the palladium market was already tight to begin with. We’d run over two years there where there was visible shortage and lease rate spikes in the market. The gold, silver, platinum, palladium market, they all trade promissory notes, not the metal. So, the pricing can be anywhere. But when you have metal shortages, with palladium, you can’t manipulate the market with paper anymore. You try to sell a load of paper, a promissory note as these spot contracts are these unallocated spot contracts. When you have physical metal shortage, those that you’ve sold the contracts to say, “Okay, we’d like to take delivery of the bars now.” And you have a default situation arising.

So the games can’t be played in the market when you have shortage as you do with rhodium, which is a sister metal. It’s not traded on exchanges, same applications as a palladium. It’s gone up nine times now in the last three years and palladium has roughly tripled in price. So, there’s been really tremendous price moves here, driven by good old-fashioned supply and demand dynamics. Pushing aside paper pricing, using these unallocated promissory notes in the COMEX and especially in London, which is the primary physical exchange.

Mike Gleason: So, how might all this affect gold and silver, which are obviously the much bigger markets and the precious metals that most of us pay more attention to. What kind of spillover effect might the situation in palladium have on the money metals? And what can we portend, potentially, as this relates to gold and silver?

David Jensen: Well, the, the spillover effect, I think, really comes from the central banks. They’ve run monetary policy now that has been, I think, wild is the kindest way to describe it, over the last 50 years especially. But they’ve run the debt market up so high and the bond market up so high. And this monetary inflation has been parked in these financial markets, especially in the bond markets. Now, what the Fed has done by choking off the money supply, they’ve, in essence, lit a fire in the bond market. Because when you trip the economy into a gross contraction, what happens is that you run enormous deficits. And in the end, you will not be able to have the demand in the market for the treasuries or whatever government security that you’re selling, and it leads to financing just by monetizing the debt.

So in essence, Mike, the demand comes from the central bank money supply or looseness of their monetary policy. It’s hidden for a very long time because the financial markets climb. They get their rulers out and they project for decades how high they’ll go. But eventually, you get to the point where you can’t stimulate the markets higher anymore because of the tremendous distortion built into the economy.

And as I maintain, really the crisis that we’re going to have now from the credit limitation that’s gone on for the last three years here. So, those holding the paper assets like bonds and other securities see that we’re in for a growth slowdown with even more gross money printing by the central banks. And that’s when you start seeing the movement from the paper holders into real assets of intrinsic value. And I think, then, what you have is just a tremendous vault in the price of these metals. But I think it will probably lead to some sort of a of a dislocation at these exchanges, which are so heavily papered and have only a tiny fraction of the amount of metal there for the number of contracts which are held in the spot markets there.

Mike Gleason: Yeah. Obviously the palladium market seems to be a market right now where supply and demand fundamentals do exist and it’s driving the price. And wouldn’t it be something if maybe that finally happened with silver, which unfortunately can be pushed around with all the paper that they seem to create there.

David Jensen: It will come. It will come to the silver market. It’ll come to the platinum and gold market. It just takes a little bit longer because they’re not quite as tight as the palladium market.

Mike Gleason: Well finally, David, as we begin to wrap up, give us an early 2020 outlook, if you would, what kind of a year do you expect it to be in the markets and the metals, specifically? And then also comment on anything else that you’re going to be watching most closely as you continue to analyze the state of the financial world.

David Jensen: Yeah. Well, I mean anything can happen in the metals market in terms of price wise. But at some point, the basic papering of the market is going to fail. Now people have been calling for that for decades. But I do think, Mike, what’s very different here is the fact that the Fed has acted as radically as it has over the last three years in contracting the money supply to the level that is well known to have caused the prior three crises. And if your listeners go to @RealDavidJensen on Twitter, the first thing that’s posted in there as a chart of the money supply, how that’s contracted and how that led to crises the last three times. So my sense is that we’re going to have a breakage at some point in these markets and the printing is going to be enormous. But also that there’ll be a sizeable amount of chaos and carnage.

So not good news. The last thing you want is metals to go up because you have a tremendous crisis on your hands. But I think that’s what the Fed really has created here. The narrative that we’re getting from the financial media is that it’s about Trump and trade. And so many of the comments are about Trump this and Trump that. And really, the core of it all, the essence of it all is the central bank, the failure of money, money printing, and the failure of using dilution of currency as a way to “stimulate” your economy. It’s never worked. It’s a complete fraud the way these systems are run and it’s time for a new monetary system.

Mike Gleason: Yeah, I couldn’t agree more and very well put. The next several years, figure to be very, very interesting, indeed. And we’ll see how will that all transpires and unfolds and look forward to having you back on to dissect it more. We’ll leave it there for today.

I thank you very much for your time and for coming back on and for sharing your insights. And I look forward to talking to you again down the road. Have a great weekend and take care, David.

David Jensen: Thanks Mike. It was my pleasure.

Mike Gleason: Well that will do it for this week. Thanks again to David Jensen of Jensen Strategic. You can follow David on Twitter @RealDavidJensen, be sure to check that out.

 

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

Tuesday, November 5, 2019

Time for Investors to Reset Their Portfolios for Inflation

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-insights/time-for-investors-to-reset-their-portfolios-for-inflation/

As investors reset their clocks to accord with the end of Daylight Savings Time, they may also need to reset their expectations for future returns.

A strong body of research suggests that artificially changing the time twice a year – forward, then backward an hour – does more harm than good.  It leads to sleep disruptions, heightened stress, missed appointments, wasted time (ironically), and a diminishment of productivity around these biannual time changes.

As reported in HeadlineHealth, “Circadian biologists believe ill health effects from daylight saving time result from a mismatch among the sun ‘clock,’ our social clock – work and school schedules – and the body’s internal 24-hour body clock.”

That mismatch can have dire consequences: “At least one study found an increase in people seeking help for depression after turning the clocks back to standard time in November.”

And “research shows the springtime start of Daylight Savings Time may be more harmful, linking it with more car accidents, heart attacks in vulnerable people and other health problems that may persist throughout the time change.”

Of course, no time is ever actually gained or loss – only redistributed from one part of the calendar to another.  But meaningless manipulation is supposed to be beneficial, somehow, as compared to following a consistent 24-hour time cycle throughout the year.

Similarly, no national wealth is gained overall through the artificial interjection of monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve.  But the central bank’s interventions do have the effect of transferring wealth – often from wage earners and savers to speculators and leveraged financial institutions.

The Fed’s recent stimulus campaigns and pronouncements on inflation may be setting up investors who buy into conventional asset markets for failure.  Last week, Fed chair Jerome Powell reiterated his goal of achieving a 2% inflation objective.

Put another way, the Fed aims to destroy 100% of the real value of any bond or bank certificate of deposit that yields 2%.  Since most savings and money market accounts yield less than that, the Fed aims to ensure they deliver negative real returns.

As we’ve seen in other parts of the world, it is possible for cash to carry a negative nominal yield as well.  But it is generally easier to get depositors and bondholders to accept negative real returns disguised with positive nominal yields.

A positive inflation rate also makes it easier for Wall Street to boost the stock market in nominal terms.  That, in turn, gets investors excited and drives further gains.

It’s a virtuous circle… until it turns vicious.  Just as booms can be artificially amplified and extended by monetary inflation, the resulting busts can be extreme as well (especially in real terms).

According to asset manager Michael Pento, “When this thing implodes, we are all screwed. On a global scale, we have never before created such a magnificent bubble”

He added, “The plunge in the stock market would be huge and from a much higher level… That’s why the Fed’s panicking.”

We wouldn’t rule out central bankers being able to prolong and extend the bubble for a while longer before it implodes.  But in the process, there could be an inflation-fueled explosion to the upside in hard asset markets including gold and silver.

 

Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the national precious metals company named 2015 “Dealer of the Year” in the United States by an independent global ratings group. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC, and his writings have appeared in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, Washington Times, and National Review.

Friday, November 1, 2019

Fed’s Own Forecasts Again Dead Wrong as QE4 Accelerates

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/economy/feds-own-forecasts-again-dead-wrong-as-qe4-accelerates/

Precious metals markets enter November’s trading with bulls eying a potential year-end rally.

Gold and silver prices did manage to post gains on Wednesday and Thursday after the Federal Reserve announced a quarter point rate cut. But the Fed followed up its move with language suggesting interest rate policy is now on pause.

News Anchor #1: The Federal Reserve cut the benchmark rate by a quarter of a percentage point. It’s now at 1.5% to 1.75%. The rate cuts come on a global slowdown; they say. Also muted inflation. Now the Fed does signal in this statement a pause for future rate cuts. The Federal Reserve statement changes the words from “act as appropriate” to “assess.”

 News Anchor #2: Fed Chairman Jerome Powell signaled that the rate-cutting exercise is likely over for now.

 Jerome Powell: We think that the current stance of policy is likely to remain appropriate, likely to remain appropriate, as long as incoming information about the economy is broadly consistent with our outlook, which is a positive one of moderate economic growth, strong labor market and inflation moving close to 2%.

Fed chairman Jerome Powell may say the current Fed funds rate is “likely to remain appropriate,” but Fed officials aren’t necessarily the most reliable forecasters of their own policy moves.

This time last year, they certainly weren’t expecting to be delivering rate cuts and bailing out the repo market with hundreds of billions of dollars in liquidity injections.

In fact, Fed policymakers were giving guidance that 3 to 4 more rate increases were planned. Instead, they have done the opposite. They just cut rates for a third time in 2019.

The Fed could end up orchestrating more unplanned interventions in the months ahead. With so much uncertainty in the economy, in U.S. politics, and in geopolitics, investors should brace for some surprises and potential black swan events that nobody sees coming.

Gold is historically and remains a premier asset to hold during uncertain times.

Global demand for physical precious metals is on the rise this year from a number of different sources. It’s not making major headlines in the United States, but robust gold buying from the Far East including China and Russia is slowly changing the dynamics for precious metals markets.

Last year, surging monetary demand from Russia and China resulted in the most global central bank buying of gold since the United States closed the gold window on the dollar in 1971.

According to official reports, China has added 106 tons of gold to state reserves so far in 2019, while Russia has acquired 145 tons of new gold. Trade disputes and the threat of widening economic sanctions appears to be accelerating gold accumulation among U.S. adversaries.

The global gold trade is steadily shifting east for other reasons. For one, the rising middle class in India and China has an enormous and growing appetite for gold jewelry.

The Chinese are also becoming more aggressive in buying and developing gold mines and trading the monetary metal on Chinese exchanges. In just the first six months of this year, gold trading on the Shanghai Futures Exchange doubled to a total value of more than $1.2 trillion. If this rate of growth continues, gold futures may one day be quoted around the world in Chinese yuan.

Despite all this, it’s doubtful that Chinese authorities intend to pursue sound money principles and transition to a gold-based yuan. They will continue to depreciate their currency just like the United States and other countries are doing.

The longer that international trade disputes go unresolved, the more likely that tit-for-tat currency devaluations will take place. The U.S. dollar has strengthened versus foreign currencies since 2018. But it declined in October and has room to decline much further in the months ahead should “weak dollar” fiscal and monetary policies prevail.

The Fed isn’t fully in line with the Trump administration in that regard. President Donald Trump continues to call for a more aggressive rate-cutting campaign from the central bank.

But the recent massive and unexpected expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet may be a game changer for the dollar. Even if the Fed remains on pause when it comes to interest rate moves, it will still effectively be continuing to ease in the months ahead through its repo market operations and Treasury bill purchases.

The prospects of that translating to a weaker dollar and higher inflation rate are pretty good. And precious metals could be among the prime beneficiaries.

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. Gleason is a hard money advocate and a strong proponent of personal liberty, limited government and the Austrian School of Economics. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. He also puts his longtime broadcasting background to good use, hosting a weekly precious metals podcast since 2011, a program listened to by tens of thousands each week.

Silver’s Three Legged Bull-Run Stool

Published here: http://goldsilverworlds.com/gold-silver-price-news/silvers-three-legged-bull-run-stool/

A case can be made that silver’s current price “stability” – believed by many to be well below where it “should” be – is the result of at least three interlocking factors.

There are certainly other considerations, but the following seem especially relevant today…

Our chosen metaphor is the three-legged stool. Take one leg away, and the stool topples. In the case of silver, the outcome is likely to be a violent price rise of epic proportions.

1. Draining the Silver Trading Swamp

In recent months, a series of criminal charges and admissions among banks, trading houses and their employees have begun to expose unfair and/or illegal trading practices. They have detrimentally influenced metals markets for many years, according to critics which include Ted Butler and the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA).

Their illicit activities include “spoofing,” i.e. placing, then withdrawing large orders to cause investors to panic/offset a position, or risk a margin call; creating almost unlimited sell orders in the futures markets to break a bull rally’s back; writing derivatives to create/lease out more “paper metal” than is physically produced each year; and perhaps even collusion with government agencies to manipulate gold and silver prices as a tool of foreign policy.

Manipulation has become so widespread and blatant that the government is now leveling racketeering charges. How it all shakes out is anyone’s guess, but this can’t help but bring increased transparency in restoring supply/demand balance to markets sorely in need of it.

2. Mined Supply Constricting

Virtually all the precious metals, some base metals, and the PGMs (platinum and palladium) are currently mired in a series of systemic factors calling into question the ability of producers to reliably meet marketplace demands through the end of the next decade.

Declining production grades (in grams, ounces, or pounds/ton) plus a lack of major new discoveries to replace what’s mined leads to lower economically recoverable reserves.

Longer discovery-to production-timelines – often by many years, due to environmental concerns and country risk – add more complexity and unpredictability to the mix.

Large, already-producing mines in some of the most mineral-rich countries on the globe – Peru, Mexico, Argentina and Chile – face water access, community-relations and country taxation issues. They call into question if a given project is worth risking additional millions (sometimes billions) of operational capital just to keep it going.

These issues, affecting mining around the globe, have for the last decade weighed on annual metals’ production – even as imports to Asian countries continue at a blistering pace.

 

3. The Global Debt Trap

The most difficult to quantify, contain, and solve hydra-headed factor of all… is the global debt overhang/negative interest rate/cash-destruction trap.

This new “river of no returns” is becoming a systemic threat. It will at some point drive people across the board to one of the few options left: the historic utility and safety of gold and silver.

Global debt now exceeds a mind-boggling $250 trillion. As it rises, waves of money and credit chasing yields have driven rates to historic lows.

Banks penalize saving and responsible business decision-making, via negative interest rates (with 19 European countries now doing so) – and make the individual’s ability to offset inflation impossible.

At some point in the near future, the overburden of mispriced assets will inevitably decline in value. Negative interest rate victims, be they in savings accounts or underfunded pension plans, will be trapped.

Add to this an outbreak of inflation as massive amounts of money chases a limited supply of negatively-correlated assets – e.g. gold and silver – and a “run for the gold” lasting multiple years is almost a certainty.

Issues #1 and 2 above can possibly be contained. But printing money to infinity in support of never-to-be-repaid debts threatens a contagion imploding the entire financial house of cards.

European central banks have already sold over €15 trillion in negative interest bonds! Now the proverbial chicken – being penalized at the retail level for trying to save – is coming home to roost.

A government-backed digital currency is the likely next step. Sweden is looking at rolling out its own version called the “e-krona.” And, of course, China has an e-currency modeled on the renminbi.

Implications for consumers of moving from positive interest rates and physical cash to a “new normal” of negative rates and digital currencies are profound – and mostly negative. You will be penalized for what you do not spend; and will have virtually no privacy, since every item purchased with “digital cash” gets recorded.

The core function of interest rates – signaling the viability in making business and personal expenditure decisions, will have been completely silenced.

A recent Money Metals Exchange interview referenced the Federal Reserve’s ongoing fiat creation, now literally taking place day and night (repo market lending)…

Perhaps the biggest takeaway from these events is that Fed stimulus is a one-way train… (It) is better understood as an addictive drug. The Fed can never withdraw it without crippling or killing the markets. Plus, there’s always the risk of an overdose.

This kind of increasingly clueless monetary behavior weakens the leg of fiscal management that provides an artificial “lid” holding down silver bullion prices.

Ongoing investigation (finally) by regulatory agencies tasked with protecting the public, and keeping banks and trading houses honest, continues to uncover dirt as traders higher up the food chain are indicted for illegal trading practices, weakening supportive leg number two.

 

The Spark

When, not if, the “Iskra” – meaning “spark” in Croatian, is lit by high volume European and North American retail buying, you can expect supply – the third and final leg keeping silver prices reasonably stable – to be pulled out from under the market.

 

As the metaphorical stool tips over, we’ll see higher price points more quickly than most observers now believe possible.

Start protecting your assets by acquiring the insurance benefits and profit potential that physical gold and silver now provide.

 

David Smith is Senior Analyst for TheMorganReport.com and a regular contributor to MoneyMetals.com. For the past 15 years, he has investigated precious metals’ mines and exploration sites in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Bolivia, China, Canada, and the U.S. He shares his resource sector findings with readers, the media, and North American investment conference attendees.